Dissatisfied with Choices

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

They don't have as much oil as Alberta, Blue. They also had a deal with the federal government (entered into by Devine and Mulroney, I believe) where for $1.00 worth of oil, they sent $1.07 to Ottawa.
 

bluealberta

Council Member
Apr 19, 2005
2,004
0
36
Proud to be in Alberta
Re: RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

Reverend Blair said:
They don't have as much oil as Alberta, Blue. They also had a deal with the federal government (entered into by Devine and Mulroney, I believe) where for $1.00 worth of oil, they sent $1.07 to Ottawa.

No, they don't but they have other resources that could be developed further. I don't know anything about the deal you mention, but I find it a bit hard to believe.
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

I found it hard to believe too, but it's the truth. Saskatcherwan is trying to get the same deal as Newfoundland now, needless to say.

They were also developing other resources when Devine came to power. That's why the province was in the black. Devine privatized the ones that were well...sold them for less than they were worth just as the crown investment was starting to pay off.

I've seen your policies in action, Blue. I've lived through what they lead to in two provinces now.
 

bluealberta

Council Member
Apr 19, 2005
2,004
0
36
Proud to be in Alberta
Re: RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

Reverend Blair said:
I found it hard to believe too, but it's the truth. Saskatcherwan is trying to get the same deal as Newfoundland now, needless to say.

They were also developing other resources when Devine came to power. That's why the province was in the black. Devine privatized the ones that were well...sold them for less than they were worth just as the crown investment was starting to pay off.

I've seen your policies in action, Blue. I've lived through what they lead to in two provinces now.

They worked in Alberta, so they are not all bad.

A friend of mine moved from Alberta to Sask in the late-90's, lived in Regina. He moved back in the early '00's. Said that property taxes on his house in Regina, which was not as good as the one he sold here, were twice what he paid here. Provincial income tax in Sask compared to Alberta was almost double. PST on everything made prices higher. He is a political veteran, having been an MP local executive officer for several years, and has degrees in political science, and supported Joe Clark, not Reform. But he said that after experiencing Sask under NDP, he would never live under an ND government again. He would move if they ever got elected in Alberta or any province he was living in.
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

Those costs all went up under the Devine government though, or to pay off the massive debt that they incurred. Under Blakeney (the NDP premier before Devine) PST was 5% and provincial taxes were lower.

Devine spent the province into a horrific debt while selling off its assets at rock bottom prices. The NDP have been building things back up ever since. They've had some major problems to deal with too...drought, BSE, crappy prices for grain, hail, floods.

Those things all have to be covered by taxes.

Like I said, I've seen where your policies lead. Long term pain for short term gain.
 

bluealberta

Council Member
Apr 19, 2005
2,004
0
36
Proud to be in Alberta
Re: RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

Reverend Blair said:
Those costs all went up under the Devine government though, or to pay off the massive debt that they incurred. Under Blakeney (the NDP premier before Devine) PST was 5% and provincial taxes were lower.

Devine spent the province into a horrific debt while selling off its assets at rock bottom prices. The NDP have been building things back up ever since. They've had some major problems to deal with too...drought, BSE, crappy prices for grain, hail, floods.

Those things all have to be covered by taxes.

Like I said, I've seen where your policies lead. Long term pain for short term gain.

Thats not what my friend related, and like I said, he is very political and financially educated.
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

Your friend, by your own account, moved there in the late nineties. Devine was gone by then. What he experienced was the aftermath. There will be several years of it yet. When I say Saskatchewan was broke, I mean there was talk of seizing the few assets left. It was really bad.

The only thing I don't know about is Regina city taxes. I have a brother that lives there and he says his aren't too high at all. I have a friend who swears his have doubled in the last ten years. That's got nothing to do with the provincial government though, it's a municipal matter. Your Conservatives are against extra money for cities, so Regina will have to get the money from someplace should they get into power and cancel the money.
 

bluealberta

Council Member
Apr 19, 2005
2,004
0
36
Proud to be in Alberta
Re: RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

Reverend Blair said:
Your friend, by your own account, moved there in the late nineties. Devine was gone by then. What he experienced was the aftermath. There will be several years of it yet. When I say Saskatchewan was broke, I mean there was talk of seizing the few assets left. It was really bad.

The only thing I don't know about is Regina city taxes. I have a brother that lives there and he says his aren't too high at all. I have a friend who swears his have doubled in the last ten years. That's got nothing to do with the provincial government though, it's a municipal matter. Your Conservatives are against extra money for cities, so Regina will have to get the money from someplace should they get into power and cancel the money.

Conservative government will work to improve cities and communities, says Harper
04 June 2005
“Cities and communities are a driving force in our economy. That is where our quality of life can be measured and appreciated.”

St John’s – In an address today to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), Conservative leader and Leader of the Opposition Stephen Harper today reinforced the Conservative commitment to address the fiscal imbalance, to reduce federal gas taxes and to address the challenges of housing and homelessness faced by many of our cities and communities.

“As we all know, as Finance Minister in the 1990s, Paul Martin slashed transfers to the provinces by some $25 billion dollars, balancing the federal books on the backs of provinces and municipalities,” said Harper. “Now, while the federal government continues to post surpluses that are always suspiciously higher than forecast – some $63 billion in understated surpluses since 1997 - many provinces are still struggling with massive deficits.”
Harper acknowledged that Canada’s municipalities face significant challenges in the areas of infrastructure, transit, environment, housing, and social services. “Providing funding to municipalities for infrastructure by means of a transfer of gas tax revenues is a long standing position of the Conservative Party and our predecessor parties, and is long overdue,” he said. “Any future Conservative government will match or exceed the level of transfer proposed in the February, 2005 budget of $5 billion over five years.”
Harper also expressed his desire to work with provinces and municipalities, private developers and non-profit organizations to address the challenges of housing and homelessness faced by many of our cities and communities. “We believe that tax incentives can spur private developers to create more affordable low income rental housing, and we will be bringing forward specific program ideas on how to do this in the months to come.”

Harper concluded, “The Liberal government's record over the past ten years has been to consistently fail Canada's cities and communities, which are a driving force in our economy. A Conservative government will listen and, together with the provinces, will work for to municipalities and cities. Ultimately, that is where our quality of life can be measured and appreciated
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

But he complained about the extra money for cities in the NDP budget amendment. So which is it? Does he secretly like the NDP amendment, or is he lying about the money he'd give to cities?

See, he contradicts himself and flip-flops and gives vague statements. Then you wonder why there is concern about Harper's secret agenda.
 

unspoken

Nominee Member
Jun 3, 2005
64
0
6
SK
With some of the talk being about Saskatchewan becoming a have province and myself being a lifelong resident of Saskatchewan, I'm going to put in my two cents here:

Bluealberta's comment about SK becoming a have province because we finally effectively began to produce oil has merit to it. Our economy is extremely based on production of resources, especially those from the agricultural sector. With both quality and prices of grain as low as they are (my father, a farmer, said last year was his worst crop in over 30 years of farming), as well as the terrible cattle prices, the province's economy would have taken a huge hit if it were not for the oil.
And before anyone goes singing the praises of the SK NDP for this, lets not forget about some of the other prudent economic decisions they have made in the past.
1. The now infamous Spudco, a 28 million dollar venture into the potato industry that went absolutely nowhere, and ended up costing nearly 10 million more on top of the investment for settlements, court costs and other legal fees.
2. Meadow Lake Pulp, a company which the NDP originally threw in 275 million and was written down several times to a value of 78.8 million. Recently they threw in another 52 million to pay off creditors in Ontario, so that equals 332 million invested into a company now worth 130 million.
3. Telecommunications investments through SaskTel in BC, Alberta, Nashville TN and Atlanta GA that have to-date lost 90 million dollars
4. A recent report by the Provincial Auditor reveals the Department of Community Resources and Employment have lost over 1 million due to an executive employee defrauding the system by writing and cashing fake welfare cheques. What the scary part about this is is that the provincial auditor has been making the government aware of irregularities in this department since 2000, and only recently was this investigated and stopped. The government regulations of this department are loose at best and easily allowed for this to happen
5. Saskatchewan may very well have a sponsorship scandal of its own, as The Department of Environment has shelled out 500,000 dollars from 1998-2004 with no services rendered.

And just a few others include government investments (and eventually losses) in electronic bingo, TV and movie production, and a major mishandling in land titles.

However, one can also attribute Saskatchewan's status of being a have province to the big raises in the rates charged by SaskPower and SaskEnergy (crown corporation monopolies, where the government refuses to let in any form of competition whatsoever. These are just a few of the ones that Calvert campaigned on to save from privatization and job loss during the last election campaign, then started handing out pink slips at three days after the NDP barely won the election).
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

Ah, a Saskatchewan Party supporter. How's Hermanson? Has he gotten the bolts removed from his neck yet?

I don't know if you've been following the news, but the price of energy has been going up all over the planet, so you are bound to see rate increases. If you'd been following the news over the last couple of years, you would have noticed that privatisation and deregulation of energy in Alberta and Ontario caused massive increases too.

You will also find that not every investment works out, whether it is the government or private enterprise running it. Jobs are created at least for a while even if a project fails though, and if the project succeeds it provides a return on your investment as well.

Nobody is saying that the Calvert government is perfect. It is better than the last Conservative government though, and changing their name to the Saskatchewan Party doesn't change the fact that the last time they were in power they almost bankrupted to province and several of them went to prison for petty theft.

You are also ignoring the positive things they have done. Two alternative energy plants that not only produce jobs and clean fuel, but give farmers a market for their crops is certainly no small deal. Neither is getting a major scientific facility at the U of S. You have a tech sector now. You have those covered buildings... I can't remember what they're called, but my cousin works there and travels all over North America as a result.

Where is your dad's farm, btw?
 

bluealberta

Council Member
Apr 19, 2005
2,004
0
36
Proud to be in Alberta
Re: RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

Reverend Blair said:
But he complained about the extra money for cities in the NDP budget amendment. So which is it? Does he secretly like the NDP amendment, or is he lying about the money he'd give to cities?

See, he contradicts himself and flip-flops and gives vague statements. Then you wonder why there is concern about Harper's secret agenda.

His budget had already included money for this. The Gas Tax rebates for cities was originally proposed by a former PC MP in June, 2003 and the Liberals and NDP voted against it. I guess the NDP and Libs know how to flip flop too.
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

What budget. The one he supported, then wasn't sure of, then was going to vote against, then voted for while voting against an amendment that would kill what he just voted for?
 

bluealberta

Council Member
Apr 19, 2005
2,004
0
36
Proud to be in Alberta
Re: RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

Reverend Blair said:
What budget. The one he supported, then wasn't sure of, then was going to vote against, then voted for while voting against an amendment that would kill what he just voted for?

no, the one for the last election.
 

bluealberta

Council Member
Apr 19, 2005
2,004
0
36
Proud to be in Alberta
Re: RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

Reverend Blair said:
Ah, a Saskatchewan Party supporter. How's Hermanson? Has he gotten the bolts removed from his neck yet?

I don't know if you've been following the news, but the price of energy has been going up all over the planet, so you are bound to see rate increases. If you'd been following the news over the last couple of years, you would have noticed that privatisation and deregulation of energy in Alberta and Ontario caused massive increases too.

So please be as critical of your NDP buddies as you have been of our Alberta conservative buddies. The same arguments apply.

You will also find that not every investment works out, whether it is the government or private enterprise running it. Jobs are created at least for a while even if a project fails though, and if the project succeeds it provides a return on your investment as well.

So please be as cirtical of your NDP buddies as you hae been of our Alberta conservative buddies. The same arguments apply.

Nobody is saying that the Calvert government is perfect. It is better than the last Conservative government though, and changing their name to the Saskatchewan Party doesn't change the fact that the last time they were in power they almost bankrupted to province and several of them went to prison for petty theft.

You are also ignoring the positive things they have done. Two alternative energy plants that not only produce jobs and clean fuel, but give farmers a market for their crops is certainly no small deal. Neither is getting a major scientific facility at the U of S. You have a tech sector now. You have those covered buildings... I can't remember what they're called, but my cousin works there and travels all over North America as a result.

So please be as positive about our Alberta conservative buddies as you are for your NDP buddies. We have put into place many wind frarms for several years now, and have developed cutting edge technology, especially in the oil industry.
Where is your dad's farm, btw?
 

bluealberta

Council Member
Apr 19, 2005
2,004
0
36
Proud to be in Alberta
Re: RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

Reverend Blair said:
Ah....You mean the one that was the worst received by the accountants.

No, I mean the one that the NDP and Liberals both said would mean a deficit financing plan, even though it was less by about $30m than the one the NDP and Libs have now foisted on us. The one that the NDP and LIbs said the country could not afford, even though it was $30m less than the one the libs and ndp have foisted upon us. YOu remember, that one.
 

bluealberta

Council Member
Apr 19, 2005
2,004
0
36
Proud to be in Alberta
Re: RE: Dissatisfied with Cho

Reverend Blair said:
Except that you're either diddling numbers or falling for the Liberal's diddling of numbers.

Explain, please. The conservatives proposed a budget in the area of $59billion, if I recall (I really don't want to go to the trouble to look up the exact numbe), which was considerably higher than the Liberals, which put everyone into a state of apoplexy, then Martins budget along with the NDP amendments took thier budet to around $85 billion. If you have other info, please let me know.
 

bluealberta

Council Member
Apr 19, 2005
2,004
0
36
Proud to be in Alberta
unspoken said:
With some of the talk being about Saskatchewan becoming a have province and myself being a lifelong resident of Saskatchewan, I'm going to put in my two cents here:

Bluealberta's comment about SK becoming a have province because we finally effectively began to produce oil has merit to it. Our economy is extremely based on production of resources, especially those from the agricultural sector. With both quality and prices of grain as low as they are (my father, a farmer, said last year was his worst crop in over 30 years of farming), as well as the terrible cattle prices, the province's economy would have taken a huge hit if it were not for the oil.
And before anyone goes singing the praises of the SK NDP for this, lets not forget about some of the other prudent economic decisions they have made in the past.
1. The now infamous Spudco, a 28 million dollar venture into the potato industry that went absolutely nowhere, and ended up costing nearly 10 million more on top of the investment for settlements, court costs and other legal fees.
2. Meadow Lake Pulp, a company which the NDP originally threw in 275 million and was written down several times to a value of 78.8 million. Recently they threw in another 52 million to pay off creditors in Ontario, so that equals 332 million invested into a company now worth 130 million.
3. Telecommunications investments through SaskTel in BC, Alberta, Nashville TN and Atlanta GA that have to-date lost 90 million dollars
4. A recent report by the Provincial Auditor reveals the Department of Community Resources and Employment have lost over 1 million due to an executive employee defrauding the system by writing and cashing fake welfare cheques. What the scary part about this is is that the provincial auditor has been making the government aware of irregularities in this department since 2000, and only recently was this investigated and stopped. The government regulations of this department are loose at best and easily allowed for this to happen
5. Saskatchewan may very well have a sponsorship scandal of its own, as The Department of Environment has shelled out 500,000 dollars from 1998-2004 with no services rendered.

And just a few others include government investments (and eventually losses) in electronic bingo, TV and movie production, and a major mishandling in land titles.

However, one can also attribute Saskatchewan's status of being a have province to the big raises in the rates charged by SaskPower and SaskEnergy (crown corporation monopolies, where the government refuses to let in any form of competition whatsoever. These are just a few of the ones that Calvert campaigned on to save from privatization and job loss during the last election campaign, then started handing out pink slips at three days after the NDP barely won the election).

Thanks for the information from someone "on the ground". You have confirmed some of what I have been told, and have provided new information as well. What were the election results, I don't recall.