Re: Harper's faulty social vision
Harper's faulty social vision:
" $1200 won't pay for quality childcare if there is no childcare system."
http://www.straightgoods.ca/ViewFeature5.cfm?REF=603
The choice factor fails in this case because the choices are not real choices. A family cannot choose formal quality child care if formal quality child care is not available.
So the choice comes down to a babysitter or a neighbour who takes children into her home. Harper's so-called "choices" would leave families to stumble on with inadequate arrangements for care of their children while they work.
As Mindelle Jabobs put it in a column in the Edmonton Sun, "[$1200] might buy winter clothes and boots for the kids, but it certainly won't make an iota of difference for families hunting for quality day care, or for those who'd prefer to have one parent stay at home."
Thats the point - no day care centres will exist if they only have the $100/mo. Harper is giving. The parents could double or triple that amount, kicking in another $200/mo., but beyond that, its getting back to the minimum wage = $800/mo so $200 off that, gee I might as well stay home. [quick math, for eg. only]
Day cares are not abundant because there is not much money in running them...
Is this how it works, generally? :
$300/mo.per child times "How many kids do you want one caregiver to take care of?" = about 10, so 3 employees and 30 kids a day times $300 = $9000/mo. <<< and the "Day Care as a Business" accountants don't find much profit.
A program of day care subsidy will help the most people, provide more equality of child care, and allow most kids to get the benefits of this social time at an early age and allow Moms and Dads to both work and thats good for the whole economy they say so lets do it eh?