Convert to Wahabbism now lest you die infidel pigs

[Hard-Luck Henry]

P.S. Check out "Bush Asks For Aid In War On Terror" by George W. Bush, whilst you're at it. It's not very good, but it does reinforce my original point, somewhat.

 

[Vanni Fucci]

Hah... :lol: :lol: :lol:

I've got to post that Henry...it's too damn funny...

Bush asks for aid in War on Terror
By George W. Bush
Published: Friday, April 2, 2004

I would like to congratulate The Rectangle on all that it has achieved thus far. I feel that The Rectangle has made tremendous progress over recent years and is now an economic and military power to contend with. My administration hopes to work with The Rectangle to create a new world free of terrorists, murderers and dictators. We hope to work for the peace and prosperity of all peoples on this planet.

As I am sure that The Rectangle is aware, we have recently rid the world of one of the most brutal dictators to have ever lived. Saddam Hussein's reign of terror has ended, and the people of Iraq are free. However, there are those that are not content to let these people have their freedom. These terrorists have no compassion for human life and will stop at nothing to derail the peace and stability that we hope to bring to a new Iraq. American soldiers, as part of the "coalition of the willing," will do their best to deter these inhuman monsters and protect the Iraqi innocents.

We cannot do this alone, however. With each passing day, terrorists become more cunning and evil, and our forces are more vulnerable. It is clear that more security is needed. Therefore, I am writing this letter to The Rectangle in the hope that it may be able to send a contingent of troops to help stabilize the situation in Iraq. The last time I spoke with the leader Chris Duffy, he said he would not send in any troops except under U.N. command. His position was understandable, seeing that elections were held in the past month. Now, after he managed to garner 100 percent of the vote in the recent elections, I ask him to reconsider his previous decision. We cannot allow the Iraqi innocents to be killed while the U.N. and the French, eating their little baguettes in their cafes, dilly-dally. I am confident that The Rectangle will make the right decision in the interest of global security and the fight against evil.

Sounds just like him too... 8O 8O

 

[peapod]

Ehm...forget me bulldog...quit side stepping answer henry's question...I am gonna keep posting it until you do

Here is the question bulldog...answer it please.

Personally, I'd like dulldog to provide some evidence that such a post even exists, nevermind the supposed professor. It's probably worth noting here that the article immediately preceding is something like "burglars have rights, too" by "Vivek Thuppil ... a junior majoring in criminals' rights and anarchy." ((see for yourselves)

 

[bulldog]

Re: RE: Convert to Wahabbism now lest you die infidel pigs

Well, Bulldog, here's what I think.

Since most of us disagree with this statement, then it would be our mission to not elect a Wahabbi government, then wouldn't it?

After all, if you don't agree with the NDP, then you don't vote for them, correct?

In essence, I ask: What's your freakin' point?

I made it. Can't you get it? I want women of the Middle East to have the same rights as Canadians. Isn't that fair? When the US practiced slavery, disagreement and contempt from other nations eventually lead to an internal upheaval.

I believe that if the Americans can shed light on this one subject and actually help the women of the ME progress to the point where they are equal and respected, then the war was worth it.
And Hard Luck - stand up for your avatar or change it.

Bull Dog

 

[bulldog]

Ehm...forget me bulldog...quit side stepping answer henry's question...I am gonna keep posting it until you do

Here is the question bulldog...answer it please.

Personally, I'd like dulldog to provide some evidence that such a post even exists, nevermind the supposed professor. It's probably worth noting here that the article immediately preceding is something like "burglars have rights, too" by "Vivek Thuppil ... a junior majoring in criminals' rights and anarchy." ((see for yourselves)

Peepod - I have given the link. It is from a pretigious university in Philadelphia.

Bull Dog

 

[bulldog]

Re: RE: Convert to Wahabbism now lest you die infidel pigs

:lol: Well, some do, mog, if they try hard enough. I think bulldog has managed to convince herself that "Sheikh Usama ibn Akhmed" is a real person, and is a real "professor of wahabbism at Drexel University."

Personally, I'd like dulldog to provide some evidence that such a post even exists, nevermind the supposed professor. It's probably worth noting here that the article immediately preceding is something like "burglars have rights, too" by "Vivek Thuppil ... a junior majoring in criminals' rights and anarchy." ((see for yourselves)

:lol: Tut! Student magazines, eh? It would be funny, if it wasn't so unfunny. :x

I, for one, am not impressed. :lol: :lol: :lol:

That's a fine bit of sleuthing you did there Henry...have you ever considered the Kingdom of God?

Monday, August 15, 2005

Cindy Sheehan is Blogging

Here is her latest posting...

Leave my family along. I apparently am the sacrificial lamb of the peace movement. I don't care about myself. Putting myself in the forefront and challenging the president on his lies left myself open to the attacks. Which are, of course, half truths and distortions.

When they start sliming my home life and my family, that's when I draw the line. Yes, my husband has filed for divorce, and yes he filed before I left for the VFP Convention and this trip to Crawford and YES IT IS BETWEEN MY HUSBAND AND I.

My point was: Cindy's family disagrees with her. I made it. Why can't you give credit where credit it due?

Bull Dog

 

[Vanni Fucci]

Re: RE: Convert to Wahabbism now lest you die infidel pigs

My point was: Cindy's family disagrees with her. I made it. Why can't you give credit where credit it due?

Bull Dog

Whatever Bullfrog... :roll:

Using the breakup of a family to further your agenda seems to be just one more compassion lacking example that repudiates your claim to be a psychologist...even a cognitive one... :roll:

Either way though, Cindy has something to say to Dubya, but Dubya's too much of a pheckin' 'fraidy cat to meet her, that's all anyone needs to know about this story... :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[moghrabi]

Where do you get the idea that the women of the ME have no rights. We are talking about how they dress and not about rights. You are mixing two things here. Have you been to the ME. My sisters are there. both are lawyers. No veil or anything. They drive and dance like you do here. Some men like their women covered. It is a mix of culture and religion.

This professor of Wahabbism is a non existent SOB. Why? Because if he is working in this University, he will be taken to Guantanamo Bay where freedom for men is plenty.

 

[annabattler]

RE: Convert to Wahabbism

Many of the world's "ills" have been the result of religion: wars,rivalries,subjugation of human rights.
Theocratic countries are NOT operated as democracies,there is no separation between church and state.
And,even in democracies,pockets of "theocracies" exist...polygamous Mormons,for example,operate in both Canada and the United States. Certainly,one could argue that women's rights in those communities are not protected.

 

[annabattler]

RE: Convert to Wahabbism

Many of the world's "ills" have been the result of religion: wars,rivalries,subjugation of human rights.
Theocratic countries are NOT operated as democracies,there is no separation between church and state.
And,even in democracies,pockets of "theocracies" exist...polygamous Mormons,for example,operate in both Canada and the United States. Certainly,one could argue that women's rights in those communities are not protected.

 

[Just the Facts]

Re: RE: Convert to Wahabbism now lest you die infidel pigs

These people have their way and they like it.

I can't presume to speak for Muslim women, but lets see what the Canadian Council of Muslim Women has to say about that.

http://www.ccmw.com/

 

[Just the Facts]

I can post an article in any paper and call myself Sheik Bin Moghrabi Bin Son of a Blob. Are we believing in everything written or said?

:lol: Well, some do, mog, if they try hard enough. I think bulldog has managed to convince herself that "Sheikh Usama ibn Akhmed" is a real person, and is a real "professor of wahabbism at Drexel University."

Personally, I'd like dulldog to provide some evidence that such a post even exists, nevermind the supposed professor.

Here is the question bulldog...answer it please.

Personally, I'd like dulldog to provide some evidence that such a post even exists,

You guys can't be serious. Are you really trying to suggest that this issue sinks or swims on the basis of one link? Do you really believe that just because Sheikh Usama ibn Akhmed is nothing more than a Lampoon figure, the issue is moot?

<shudder>

 

[peapod]

Ehm....bulldog henry asked you to prove Sheikh Usama ibn Akhmed" is a real "professor of wahabbism at Drexel University.
Again, you have tried to twist. You posted from a student newspaper, now your trying to pass it off as the something the university said... :roll: :roll: :roll: typical neo-con lies.

I don't see Sheikh Usama ibn Akhmed listed in the faculty list at Drexel university.

http://www.drexel.edu/faculty/index.html

But there you go again, altering and mis-representing. No surprise why you have no problems assuming you have the right to vilify and mis-represent a women who lost her son.

 

[Just the Facts]

I don't see Sheikh Usama ibn Akhmed listed in the faculty list at Drexel university.

I guess you are serious after all. Yes, the Sheikh is a fictional character...a Lampoon parady of, well, real Sheikhs

I can find you a multitude of links to real Islamic Scholars who say very much the same thing. I'm sure you're perfectly capable of finding those yourselves, though.

 

[peapod]

Thats not the question tho is it? quit trying to change the question. Where does it show at Drexel university that this person is a professor?
Excuse me! who could take this seriously! when mis-represention and lies are posted as legitmate. That is what this is about. The story and link posted by bulldog is bullshit!

 

[Just the Facts]

Thats not the question tho is it? quit trying to change the question. Where does it show at Drexel university that this person is a professor?
Excuse me! who could take this seriously! when mis-represention and lies are posted as legitmate. That is what this is about. The story and link posted by bulldog is bullshit!

OK then. I guess we conclude that women are not oppressed because there is no professor of wahbbism at Drexel University. And someone accused me of convoluted logic.

 

[PoisonPete2]

I don't see Sheikh Usama ibn Akhmed listed in the faculty list at Drexel university.

I guess you are serious after all. Yes, the Sheikh is a fictional character...a Lampoon parady of, well, real Sheikhs

I can find you a multitude of links to real Islamic Scholars who say very much the same thing. I'm sure you're perfectly capable of finding those yourselves, though.

Answer - Gee, quotes of fictional charactors are so much better than using real quotes to substanciate an insubstancial position, don't you think. (That was sarcasm). Next time we will go for an understanding of 'Parody'. All part of Psych Ops, a division of Propaganda.

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities - Voltaire

 

[peapod]

Ya right! nice try! its about lies and mis-representation...funny innit with all the "correct" information...bulldog has to post lies and mis-representations. But than again that supports her "national enquiry" approach to facts. I think its called bullshit logic. Oh I see...for certain arguments its alright to mis-represent and muddy the waters :roll: :roll: :roll:

 

[Just the Facts]

Ya right! nice try! its about lies and mis-representation...

Nice try back. It's not about lies and misrepresentation. It's about women's rights. It's not about some imaginary Sheikh, it's about women's rights.

I am always particularly concerned with the women's rights portion of any political movement or issue. Can we concentrate on that one area in this article and not get side-tracked?

I guess not, Bulldog, I guess not.

 

[Just the Facts]

Answer - Gee, quotes of fictional charactors are so much better than using real quotes to substanciate an insubstancial position, don't you think.

OK next Iraqi woman who gets acid thrown in her face for showing up at Baghdad university without hijab, we'll just tell her not to worry, the Sheikh is fictional and her wounds are insubstancial.

That was sarcasm too. :wink: