Conrad Murray Trial -

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
Conrad Murray Trial begins.

Thoughts about what will be revealed during this drama?? Thoughts (predictions) as to the outcome ie. Verdict ??

So far it is quite interesting.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Well, he's probably liable of being incompetent, but Jackson was a hardcore junkie, this sort of end was inevitable.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
Incompetence .......yes. But don't think they can prove INTENT to harm ...as I don't think it was there.

Suspect that Jacksons body just reached over load with all the drugs in his system. It would not take all that much to reach lethal levels.

Jackson was a walking time bomb. And it could have been any physician that could be bought with money in that room .

Murray also crossed over the line of professionalism , ethics, and standards.

Wonder how many physicians were approached by the Jackson team until Murray agreed to join this totally pathological "relationship".

Hard core addicts like Jackson are professional Dr. shoppers ....
 

Liberalman

Senate Member
Mar 18, 2007
5,623
36
48
Toronto
The good doctor left the nurse to watch Jackson but the nurse had to leave to do something else. The doctor will be found not guilty and the nurse will take the fall
 

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
Shouldn't the actual evidence be presented before this guy or his nurse are judged? I mean I'm not a fan of Michael Jackson (never was... bes I could say was that I was ambivalent to some of his stuff) but isn't the process supposed to be that someone accused of a crime gets a trial with evidence and witnesses before they are sacrificed to appease a mob that wants to blame someone else for their idol's downfall?
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
When you listen to Michaels words that have been played on the media .... the smoking gun seems to be Jackson himself. You can't even understand what he is saying due to slurring and slowed speach. (almost incoherent )

His protracted history of addiction and manipulating people into getting him the drugs is not going to work in his favor . And should not.

An addict desperate for that fix can and will do anything..

Sure he had talent. Sure he was famous. But that does not mean he was not a hard core addict . Just like Elvis .....he needed to have the appearance of prescriptions for the drugs of choice.(makes it more "acceptable " in their minds. -particularly when some vague physical symptoms exist or are created. Both knew the system and how to attract the vulnerable type of care giver that would give in to either the money and /or the idea of having a famous person as a "patient".

So far the drugs mentioned are all hi level addictive substances that require prescriptions.

....Interesting to hear what the M Jackson spokesperson has to say. They admit they do NOT WANT TO HEAR about the Demerol or any of the other substances that Michael was addicted , The pattern of an addictive pathology is already evolving.(this includes his enablers)

Shouldn't the actual evidence be presented before this guy or his nurse are judged? I mean I'm not a fan of Michael Jackson (never was... bes I could say was that I was ambivalent to some of his stuff) but isn't the process supposed to be that someone accused of a crime gets a trial with evidence and witnesses before they are sacrificed to appease a mob that wants to blame someone else for their idol's downfall?

Of course you are right. Given the opening statements.....it will be interesting to see the information that is revealed.
 
Last edited:

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Shouldn't the actual evidence be presented before this guy or his nurse are judged? I mean I'm not a fan of Michael Jackson (never was... bes I could say was that I was ambivalent to some of his stuff) but isn't the process supposed to be that someone accused of a crime gets a trial with evidence and witnesses before they are sacrificed to appease a mob that wants to blame someone else for their idol's downfall?
...

Of course you are right.

Wow!!! You actually believe in jurisprudence?

Does that mean we won't be seeing anymore of you diatribes about this republican or that one, condemning them without the benefit of a fair trial?
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
...



Wow!!! You actually believe in jurisprudence?

Does that mean we won't be seeing anymore of you diatribes about this republican or that one, condemning them without the benefit of a fair trial?

This fairness only applies to people Breezy approves of....don't ya know;-)