Coalition Soldier Killed in Afghanistan

[India1989]

Try to fight terror. see i am from India and in India every m month there's a 9/11 attack. Everyday Indian soldiers stop 20 terrorist attacks.

see you guys should be aware. You guys never supported India in the war against terrorism. Now when you are affected by it you guys are creating havoc. But still you won't support India.

Canada maybe lost a few 100 soldiers. India lost more then 60,000 soldiers in the war against terrorism for 57 years. If we weren't determined then India wouldn't exist as we are surrounded by terrorist countries. Their aim is to make India bleed and then break India apart. THis was their dream in 1989. But we kept it as their dream instead broke them apart.

So i am telling you. Backing out from this war will not solve your problem.

 

[notme01]

what to you call terrorist attack someone fighting for their rights and freedom ...

or someone just killing for the fun of it ?

 

[JonB2004]

Re: RE: Coalition Soldier Killed in Afghanistan

it could also be Bush trying to scare everyone . he wants to dominate the world

Bush doesn't want to scare anyone. And I'd like to ask you. How have you come to the conclusion that Bush conspired 9/11 and killed 3000 people? Why would the President of the United States kill 2500 of his own people? Why would the President plan an attack so that he could invade Afghanistan? Because he wants to dominate the world? You are a conspiracy theorist. I don't talk to you kind of people.

 

[notme01]

well why could it not be true because the US media says so maybe?

or what ?


it could be either way since we have no concrete proof except the word of a president that defies a everyone and lies to get his way just like in Iraq he said he had proof of gas weapon and bio chemical weapons there and that is why he started the war ...
well did he find any ????

lies lies lies

 

[JonB2004]

Re: RE: Coalition Soldier Killed in Afghanistan

well why could it not be true because the US media says so maybe?

or what ?


it could be either way since we have no concrete proof except the word of a president that defies a everyone and lies to get his way just like in Iraq he said he had proof of gas weapon and bio chemical weapons there and that is why he started the war ...
well did he find any ????

lies lies lies

All of the media says so. bin Laden was responsible for 9/11. Period.

We do have concrete proof. bin Laden released a tape that states he is responsible for 9/11. Are you too dense to get that? I don't think Bush should be in Iraq, but getting into that would be getting off topic. We can debate Iraq another day.

 

[India1989]

Terrorist attack is when people are killing innocent people to achieve their aim. And why do you ask me this question?

What do you think is an terrorist attack? Attacking Canada or US?

 

[notme01]

no india i agree with your version of terrorist

but what would we call someone that defies the government policies and tries to stop them but kill innocent people at the same time by accident


let an uprising because of bad things happening in a country

 

[dekhqonbacha]

Re: RE: Coalition Soldier Killed in Afghanistan

...
The war in Afghanistan is the right thing to do. You can think whatever you want, but I'm right.

...

Jon
is it you telling "war in Afghanistan is the rigth thing to do?" You were 100% against war in Afghanistan, and you critisized whoever didn't think so.

Why did you change your position. Well, it's okay sometime people understand their mistakes and change position. But not like you. You were 100% against it, and now 100% for it.

 

[Said1]

Re: RE: Coalition Soldier Killed in Afghanistan

well why could it not be true because the US media says so maybe?

or what ?


it could be either way since we have no concrete proof except the word of a president that defies a everyone and lies to get his way just like in Iraq he said he had proof of gas weapon and bio chemical weapons there and that is why he started the war ...
well did he find any ????

lies lies lies

Intelligence agencies from all over the world believed that Saddam had WMDs. Clinton made a speech in 1998 in which he made clear, in no uncertain terms, that Saddam as of that date, was still in possession of WMDs. Clinton also signed the Iraqi Liberation Act, wherein it states ""This Act makes clear that it is the sense of the Congress that the United States should support those elements of the Iraqi opposition that advocate a very different future for Iraq than the bitter reality of internal repression and external aggression that the current regime in Baghdad now offers. . . . On October 21, 1998, I signed into law the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental
Appropriations Act, 1999, which made $8 million available for assistance to the Iraqi democratic opposition. . . My Administration, as required by that statue, has also begun to implement a program to compile information regarding allegations of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes by Iraq's current leaders as a step towards bringing to justice those directly responsible for such acts." http://www.fas.org/news/iraq/1998/11/01/981101-in.htm

Clinton commissioned report after report detailing Saddam's nuclear capabilities.

If anything, the intel was a colaborative effort, on behalf of Clinton, Bush and the rest of the freekin world. Well, not rest, but a good chunk of it. If Bush is lying, then so are they.


But really, if the rest of the world was selling him crap, it's kind of obvious....IF YOU THINK ABOOT IT. :lol:

 

[dekhqonbacha]

I don't think that Saddam had WMD in his possesion.

 

[Said1]

Re: RE: Coalition Soldier Killed in Afghanistan

I don't think that Saddam had WMD in his possesion.

I think he had stuff stored. Left overs from the Iran-Iraq war, possibly some other stuff too. A danger to his neighbours had he possessed the capabilities to go to war with one of them, which I doubt too. To be honest, I don't think he had any serious ties to terrorists orgs either, although I think he might have looked the other way to save his own ass, not unlike the Saudis, possibly causing his demise - so to speak.

 

[JonB2004]

Re: RE: Coalition Soldier Killed in Afghanistan

...
The war in Afghanistan is the right thing to do. You can think whatever you want, but I'm right.

...

Jon
is it you telling "war in Afghanistan is the rigth thing to do?" You were 100% against war in Afghanistan, and you critisized whoever didn't think so.

Why did you change your position. Well, it's okay sometime people understand their mistakes and change position. But not like you. You were 100% against it, and now 100% for it.

I talked to Mogz and ITN and they have convinced me that it is the right thing to do. Believe me, I put alot of thought into it before I change my position on Afghanistan. I was wrong. The war in Afghanistan is the right thing to do.

 

[dekhqonbacha]

if Saddam had WMD in his possession, he would treaten US and world in case of invasion. Or in worst case he would use it to destroy aliens. Iraqi desert is a perfect place to test those bombs.

 

[dekhqonbacha]

Re: RE: Coalition Soldier Killed in Afghanistan

I talked to Mogz and ITN and they have convinced me that it is the right thing to do. Believe me, I put alot of thought into it before I change my position on Afghanistan. I was wrong. The war in Afghanistan is the right thing to do.

Well, okay.
Then don't stick on one thing. You might be wrong. Always accept the thought of others. After all everybody is right. They are just wrong because their thougths differ from ours. Never critisize those people. In contrast listen carefully why they think so.

Be good.

 

[dekhqonbacha]

The advantages for Canada being in Afghatnistan is that Canada is seen as peaceful and peacekeeping nation, it's also for sphere of influnce, it will give an democracy building face, and others.

The disadvantages are that Canada will not get what it is expecting to get or what it is deserved to get. China and Russia from one side and US from other side are disputing for that area.

Russia always wanted to get closer to Indian ocean. Tsar Russia conquered Central Asia and prepering attack to Afghanistan. British empire from India also wanted to conquer Afghanistan and to have an acces to vast cultivated areas of Central Asia. To prevent the battle of two empires, they decided to declare Afghanistan neutral zone.

Now China wants the petrol to reach it safely from Middle east. The only way to do it is to have a control over Afghanistan. And also China is claming many parts of Central Asia and Afghanistan as its territory.

USA wants to be under the nose of fast growing China, and military superpower Russia. US also wants to control all the pipelines that go from middle east to china and to have a control over the huge trade between Russia and India. US also wants to increase it's sphere of influnce in Central Asia.

There is simply no room for Canada to be there.

Canada will be thanked for building democracy, and briging stability to the business of US, China and Russia.

 

[Said1]

Re: RE: Coalition Soldier Killed in Afghanistan

if Saddam had WMD in his possession, he would treaten US and world in case of invasion. Or in worst case he would use it to destroy aliens. Iraqi desert is a perfect place to test those bombs.

Why would he do that? Look what happened when all he had was some left over junk? :lol:

 

[dekhqonbacha]

That's why US inteligence new about it. They knew that the deployment of troups wouldn't be risky.

 

[Said1]

As did the 'others'.

 

[notme01]

so this means they went to war with false truth (fabricated truth )
just like they fabricated everything else about the 911 disaster ... it was a way to distract their citizens from a disaster that could have been prevented because they knew before hand about it ...