China may ban Catholics from 2008 Olympics

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
I don't think that a comparison between those nations and governments whom history demonstrates are fully capable of mass extermination characterized as "war" plays a significant role in determining what's "right" or what's "wrong" what....leads up to and actualizes patriotic slaughter...dictatorship coups, juntas and "civil" wars are all recorded in history and we have but to examine that record to realize that far more potential was lost while those freedoms and structures of social organizing principles have become more fluid over time....

No one has ever "won" at the habit of warfare....everyone has lost.....

People suffering under a tyranical regime have been freed and geographic areas have been "cleared" both literally and figuratively... And the cycles of "necessity" national interests in "protecting" "investments and "resouces" and "markets"...has become the language of war instead of principles of humanity looking at itself and determining whether freedom justice and prosperity are merely labels or if they really do have "meaning".

Human kind has failed to mature as a species and is slated by evolution for extinction as an unnecessary and entirely destructive self-absorbed oppositionally minded species that is unable and unwilling to accept responsibility for its own demise....
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
My take on the China v Tibet thing is this. I really don't know about the history and culture of Tibet but I would imagine that Zharkov is not lieing nor is Doc. It is possible that both governments were evil. Look at WWII when the Nazis invaded Stalin's Soviet Union. We can all agree that both were brutal governments and one invaded the other.
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Deciding some bloodletting is appropriate because someone else or some people are regarded as "evil"....why does this ring such a bell in my head when I think about the American war on Terrorism..?
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Never mind....

Obviously the world's much safer now than it was ten years ago.......
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Deciding some bloodletting is appropriate because someone else or some people are regarded as "evil"....why does this ring such a bell in my head when I think about the American war on Terrorism..?

So the people America fights aren't evil?
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Not if they live in Pakistan and supply weapons and fanatics to terrorism apparently...
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
America's choice of who or what "evil" leaves a great deal to be desired. Let's review the necessity of Pinochet or Suharto or the actions of the Reagan Administration and Ollie North....

Questions Eaglesmack.....
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
America's choice of who or what "evil" leaves a great deal to be desired. Let's review the necessity of Pinochet or Suharto or the actions of the Reagan Administration and Ollie North....

Questions Eaglesmack.....

So lets here it from you oh Great One from the Most Honorable North... are the people that we are fighting evil or not. Maybe you do not think they are.

Since we are spinning this thread... shall we talk about Canada's insistence on mining and selling asbestos to 3rd World Nations even though they KNOW for a fact it is killing them? I mean obviously Canada is without sin and is a Beacon of Goddness.
 

donsutherland1

New Member
May 10, 2007
16
1
3
New York
DocDred,

When one does analytical work, one needs to consider the quality of the source. Until one can dismiss possible biases, one should treat the source's information with healthy skepticism. One of the issues affecting U.S. Intelligence in the run-up to the war in Iraq was that the Intelligence community relied too heavily on "compromised" sources affiliated with the Iraqi National Congress. These sources had a motivation to see Saddam Hussein toppled and misled the Intelligence community.

China would risk losing the Olympic games if it started barring athletes from participating. China has too much to lose if it did so.
 
May 28, 2007
3,866
67
48
Honour our Fallen
I really don't know about the history and culture of Tibet . It is possible that both governments were evil. .

remind me not to reply to you ever again.... iknow thats impossible cause i'm prone to forgetting the impact of a statement like that from someone I thought used their noodle.
i mean this guy has pages of thoughts on Iraq and American politics....
 
May 28, 2007
3,866
67
48
Honour our Fallen
DocDred,

When one does analytical work, one needs to consider the quality of the source. Until one can dismiss possible biases, one should treat the source's information with healthy skepticism. One of the issues affecting U.S. Intelligence in the run-up to the war in Iraq was that the Intelligence community relied too heavily on "compromised" sources affiliated with the Iraqi National Congress. These sources had a motivation to see Saddam Hussein toppled and misled the Intelligence community.

China would risk losing the Olympic games if it started barring athletes from participating. China has too much to lose if it did so.

You know they only got the Olympics cause it's will aid in them becoming a civil society.

The olympics are about freedom and the epitome of human endevour in sport.

They butchered a beautiful peaceful people because they could.Tibet had nothing to do with China. zero....no one wanted them to come in and they had to use force to accomplish it....
Tibet was a beautiful place , all this negative stuff i read here I can't believe is being said......But then again china's propaganda is far reaching...did I tell you they poisoned ouR food supply, our pets food supply as well and are now selling antifreeze as a rip off colgate toothpaste....i mean who are these people? lead paint in kids toys
 

donsutherland1

New Member
May 10, 2007
16
1
3
New York
DocDred,

I'm fully aware of the other issues you cite. My point concerned only the 2008 Olympics and that it is highly unlikely that China would do anything to jeopardize its ability to host that event.
 
May 28, 2007
3,866
67
48
Honour our Fallen
DocDred,

I'm fully aware of the other issues you cite. My point concerned only the 2008 Olympics and that it is highly unlikely that China would do anything to jeopardize its ability to host that event.

Well I doubt they will lose the event on account of comments made from various people in the people's party..lol people's party doesn't sound like the thugs that make it up eh! We the people's party are telling you not to think about political reformation cause it's good for you. Trust us after all we are the people's party

And like who's gonna host it.. here toronto you got 6 months to put it together.....


I predict that you won't see any protests, just a great party and showing off all thats truly great about China. Like are you going to spend 10 grand to go there and stand around wearing a Dalai Lama t-shirt to see what happens....I saw where there is this huge education program to stop people from hoarking nuggies everywhere.....
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
15,250
2,880
113
Toronto, ON
DocDred,

I'm fully aware of the other issues you cite. My point concerned only the 2008 Olympics and that it is highly unlikely that China would do anything to jeopardize its ability to host that event.

At this point, what is the IOC going to do? With only 1 year to go the IOC is stuck with China come hell or high water. They will let them do what they want and claim at the end that they were the best Olympics ever (like they do every Olympics).
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
remind me not to reply to you ever again.... iknow thats impossible cause i'm prone to forgetting the impact of a statement like that from someone I thought used their noodle.
i mean this guy has pages of thoughts on Iraq and American politics....

Take it easy Doc. I said I didn't know much about the govt. of Tibet and believe me I am no fan of China. I am just saying that evil govts. also engage in warfare against each other. I wasn't trying to get you going.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Greetings from China y'all.

Boy have sparks been flying on this thread as I've been able to see.

Well, anyway, here's my around 10 or 12 fen worth (about 2 cents):

I have read as well before, while still in Canada, that Tibet did in fact have a theocracy prior to the Communict takeover, and it wasn't pretty. Granted, the communist regime has caused much damage too, especially to the culture.

As for religious freedom, it's a mixed bag, really. As for personal freedom of religion, I have just as much here as I do in Canada. As for freedom of religious organization, yes, I do feel quite suffocated in that respect. But I still wouldn't go so far as to say I'm persecuted. If it were that bad, I'd be back in Canada. There is, let's say, enough freedom of religion to not warrant the label 'persecution'.

I served as editor for one publication a while back, and my experience was interesting there too. We were explicitly told by the administration to watch for:

Any reference parallelling Taiwan with the PRC. For example, the phrase "Taiwan and China" would have to be rendered "Taiwan and the mainland" or some other wording that suggests unity. That's not a big deal really seeing that the UN (and the US by the way) recognize Taiwan as a part of China anyway, so that is in fact a legitimate change in the direction fo accuracy.

We had to avoid any topic dealing with ethnic issues. I can understand that because when I'd visited Xinjiang, I can tell you that inter-ethnic relations there were not always warm and fuzzy.

We had to avoid religious issues, especially concerning Islam (that was explicitly mentionned), although it seemd little quips about Christmas and Easter were fine.

Strangely enough, though, it would seem that in the cities at least, the Chinese celebrate Christmas more than we do! In Canada, neither I nor most of my friends celebrated Christmas unless invited to do so by some Christian friends (but then most of my friends weren't Christian). In in China, everyone and his dog celebrates Christmas, no religious significance though.

Going back to religion, I would say that China is definitely moving, albeit slowly, towards more, not less, freedom of religoin. Just give it time. I had some Philipino Catholic friends who'd invited me to church recently, and lo and behold, an ordained American priest had been invited as a guest to give one mass in English. This was at a government approved church of course. And on Christmas, the police were sitting in one room 'for protection'. Hmmmm.... This is months before the American prist came. But anyway, this past Christmas, I'd decided to go have a chat with the cops (hey, I'm the curious type), but the local Chinese priest, who can speak some English, advised me otherwise, saying that if the cops ask questions (since I can speak Chinese), just keep my answers simple. Hm, not that I possessed any incriminating info anyway. Anyway, I'd also found out that this priest, though a member of the patriotic church, is also secretly ordained by the vatican and does stay in touch with it via the net. Praise the internet! I'd found that out from my Catholic friends.

As for Islam, I'd one Pakistani friend who'd mentionned that on 'Id al Fitr a few years ago, the police arrived at a local mosque with cameras to film the participants. One cop entered with his boots on! Ouch! So my Pakistani friend stared the cop down and gave him the dirtiest look. The cop got the hint, looked apologetic, walked out, took his dirty boots off, and came back in to film.

Curious george that I am, I've visited churches, mosques and Buddhist temples. In Muslim restaurants, the 99 names of Allah are often postered on the wall with prayer rugs depicing the Qa-aba in Makka. Some local Muslims can speak some Arabic too. On the other hand, I have heard from some locals with friends from Xinjiang that apparently the teaching and learning of the Arabic language is very tightly controlled in Xinjiang. Then again, from my experiences, it would seem that foreign language acquisition policy is politically motivated overall anyway.

If I go to a Buddhist restaurant for vegetarian food, I'll find an altar with a statue in some prominent location with people prostrating before it.

So as I'd said at the beginning of this post, it really is a mixed bag. But certainly not persecution. And moving in the right direction I must say. More freedom now than before.

And as for the great chairman, don't diss him; for all his faults, he's still respected in China, and while he may have made many mistakes, he'd done many great things for China too.

yes, yes, and this from a Canadian.
 
Last edited: