Chimps are more evolved than humans
- Thread starter Blackleaf
- Start date
Yah Desmond it came to me about twenty minutes ago, now I'll try and remember what it was about that'll take a couple of weeks.:lol:
This is all wiki has.
The Naked Ape
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Book cover
The Naked Ape: A Zoologist's Study of the Human Animal (ISBN 0-385-33430-3) is a book by Desmond Morris which looks at humans as a species and compares them to other animals. It depicts human behavior as partially evolved to meet the challenges of prehistoric life as a hunter-gatherer (see nature versus nurture).
A 1973 movie directed by Donald Driver — based on the book — was made starring Johnny Crawford and Victoria Principal.
[edit] External link
The Naked Ape at the Internet Movie Database
This article about a science book is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
The Naked Ape
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Book cover
The Naked Ape: A Zoologist's Study of the Human Animal (ISBN 0-385-33430-3) is a book by Desmond Morris which looks at humans as a species and compares them to other animals. It depicts human behavior as partially evolved to meet the challenges of prehistoric life as a hunter-gatherer (see nature versus nurture).
A 1973 movie directed by Donald Driver — based on the book — was made starring Johnny Crawford and Victoria Principal.
[edit] External link
The Naked Ape at the Internet Movie Database
This article about a science book is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Are you trying to start a fight Gilbert? Put em up, i'll hit you with a left upper cross and a right under cut and dance like a moth etc:lol:In some folks they aren't attributes at all.
certainly not. But history and records are (almost exclusively). So humans can learn something once and have the whole race remember it for ever. Or until the DVD's delaminate.
Good God, Blackleaf left himself so wide open, it wouldn't even be much fun to burn him on this one!
I beg to differ on that as well, because of inherited memory not lost in infancy animals enjoy historical records of sorts, commonly called instinct.:smile:
very true. which is why i wrote the words in the parentheses. The difference between historical records you refer to as instinct and human records is that instinct is "one to one", whereas human communications are one-to-many, in fact often one-to-all when the communication is important enough, or deemed so. So with instinct, if all those individuals who hold the knowledge die, or are excommunicated somehow, the knowledge is either lost or confined to one group. With technological histories the knowledge is made, at least in theory, immortal.