Chernobyl Death Toll: 985,000, Mostly from Cancer

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Chernobyl Death Toll: 985,000, Mostly from Cancer By Prof. Karl Grossman, March 13, 2013

This past April 26th marked the 24th anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear plant accident. It came as the nuclear industry and pro-nuclear government officials in the United States and other nations were trying to “revive” nuclear power. And it followed the publication of a book, the most comprehensive study ever made, on the impacts of the Chernobyl disaster.
Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment was published by the New York Academy of Sciences.
It is authored by three noted scientists:
Russian biologist Dr. Alexey Yablokov, former environmental advisor to the Russian president;
Dr. Alexey Nesterenko, a biologist and ecologist in Belarus; and
Dr.Vassili Nesterenko, a physicist and at the time of the accident director of the Institute of Nuclear Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus.
Its editor is Dr. Janette Sherman, a physician and toxicologist long involved in studying the health impacts of radioactivity.
The book is solidly based — on health data, radiological surveys and scientific reports — some 5,000 in all.
It concludes that based on records now available, some 985,000 people died, mainly of cancer, as a result of the Chernobyl accident. That is between when the accident occurred in 1986 and 2004. More deaths, it projects, will follow.
The book explodes the claim of the International Atomic Energy Agency– still on its website that the expected death toll from the Chernobyl accident will be 4,000. The IAEA, the new book shows, is under-estimating, to the extreme, the casualties of Chernobyl.
Alice Slater, representative in New York of the Nuclear Age Peace
Foundation, comments: “The tragic news uncovered by the comprehensive
new re



DB That will continue to kill for twenty thousand years.DB
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Ahhh right. There was a nice long thread about this before. The no nukes crowd couldn't get the right amount of dead people so they started counting everyone who died from heart disease, alcohol related deaths, as well as each and every cancer death as a direct result of Chernobyl.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,631
9,202
113
Washington DC
Of course, the normal operation of coal-fired power plants kills 400,000 a year. That's the normal operation, not disasters.

Put a turbine in front of the mouth of everyone who holds elective public office and everyone who has more'n 20 followers on Twitter.

Pass a law saying no television may be sold that is not attached to and powered exclusively by a stationary bicycle.

Energy problem. . . sorted.

Obesity epidemic. . . sorted.

Next?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
It is a small number compared to what it will be for Japan 24 years after the 'event'.

There's some kind of cooling problem at Fukishima again.

Of course, the normal operation of coal-fired power plants kills 400,000 a year. That's the normal operation, not disasters.

Put a turbine in front of the mouth of everyone who holds elective public office and everyone who has more'n 20 followers on Twitter.

Pass a law saying no television may be sold that is not attached to and powered exclusively by a stationary bicycle.

Energy problem. . . sorted.

Obesity epidemic. . . sorted.

Next?

Doctors kill millions. You're stationary bicycle would exhaust you long before your kraft diner was warm.