Caution: Marijuana may not be lesser evil

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com
By Rita Rubin, USA TODAY
Tyreol Gardner first smoked marijuana when he was 13.

"The main reason I tried it was curiosity," Gardner recalls. "I wanted to see what it felt like."

He liked what it felt like, and by age 15, he was smoking pot every week. He supported his habit with the money his parents gave him for getting straight A's on his report card. They didn't have a clue.

"By 16, when I got my license, it turned into a fairly everyday thing," says Gardner, now 24. "I believe it is very addictive, especially for people with addictive personalities."

Millions of baby boomers might disagree. After all, they smoked marijuana — the country's most popular illicit drug — in their youth and quit with little effort.

But studies have shown that when regular pot smokers quit, they do experience withdrawal symptoms, a characteristic used to predict addictiveness. Most users of more addictive drugs, such as cocaine or heroin, started with marijuana, scientists say, and the earlier they started, the greater their risk of becoming addicted.

Many studies have documented a link between smoking marijuana and the later use of "harder" drugs such as heroin and cocaine, but that doesn't necessarily mean marijuana causes addiction to harder drugs.

"Is marijuana a gateway drug? That question has been debated since the time I was in college in the 1960s and is still being debated today," says Harvard University psychiatrist Harrison Pope, director of the Biological Psychiatry Laboratory at Boston's McLean Hospital. "There's just no way scientifically to end that argument one way or the other."

That's because it's impossible to separate marijuana from the environment in which it is smoked, short of randomly assigning people to either smoke pot or abstain — a trial that would be grossly unethical to conduct.

"I would bet you that people who start smoking marijuana earlier are more likely to get into using other drugs," Pope says. Perhaps people who are predisposed to using a variety of drugs start smoking marijuana earlier than others do, he says.

Besides alcohol, often the first drug adolescents abuse, marijuana may simply be the most accessible and least scary choice for a novice susceptible to drug addiction, says Virginia Tech psychologist Bob Stephens.

No matter which side you take in the debate over whether marijuana is a "gateway" to other illicit drugs, you can't argue with "indisputable data" showing that smoking pot affects neuropsychological functioning, such as hand-eye coordination, reaction time and memory, says H. Westley Clark, director of the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment at the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

Adolescents have the greatest rates of marijuana use, and they also have the greatest amount to lose by using marijuana, scientists say.

"Adolescence is about risk-taking, experimentation," says Yasmin Hurd, professor of psychiatry, pharmacology and biological chemistry at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York who last summer published a rat study that found early exposure to THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, led to a greater sensitivity to heroin in adulthood.

"All of the studies clearly show the earlier someone starts taking marijuana, the greater their vulnerability to addiction disorders and psychiatric disorders. I'm so shocked still that so many parents are not considering enough the dangers of early drug use."

Use is more common

Marijuana use by adolescents in the USA declined slightly from 2005 to 2006, but it's still more common than it was 15 years ago, according to "Monitoring the Future," an ongoing study by the University of Michigan that tracks people from the eighth grade through young adulthood. It's paid for by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, or NIDA, part of the National Institutes of Health.

In 2006, 11.7% of eighth-graders said they had used marijuana during the past year, compared with 6.2% of eighth-graders in 1991. Among 12th-graders, 31.5% said they had used marijuana in the previous year; in 1991, 23.9% said they had.

"You are at school, and your main job as an adolescent is to learn and memorize," NIDA director Nora Volkow says. But if you keep becoming intoxicated by smoking marijuana, she says, you'll fall further and further behind in your studies. "How are you going to catch up?"

In a study comparing heavy marijuana users with people who'd had minimal exposure to the drug, Pope found that the former had lower verbal IQ scores than the latter. In a 2003 paper, he and his co-authors postulated three potential reasons: innate differences between the groups in cognitive ability that predated first marijuana use, an actual toxic effect of marijuana on the developing brain or poorer learning of conventional cognitive skills by young marijuana users who skipped school.

Wasted years

By the time Gardner was a junior, he started skipping high school regularly to smoke pot. "I would always find somebody who wasn't at school that day and get high with them," he says. Gardner says he missed 50 days in the first semester of his senior year. His parents discovered his stash of marijuana and sent him to a psychiatrist. His grades plummeted; his college plans evaporated.

When he was 16 or 17, Gardner says, he was charged at least twice with possession of marijuana and underage possession of alcohol. The court sent him to a three-month outpatient treatment program. He attended weekly sessions and underwent urine checks.

But it didn't stick. He celebrated the end of the program by getting high on pot and alcohol. By 18, "I was pretty heavy into cocaine," Gardner says. Crystal meth and intravenous heroin followed.

"I was always looking for the ultimate high. It was like a constant search, and I never found it. … By the end, it was a living hell for me."

Finally, Gardner says, his parents persuaded him to enter an inpatient treatment program in Winchester, Va. They spoke from experience. When he was 8, Gardner says, his father stopped using drugs while in prison for possession. "My mom got clean while he was in prison."

Gardner says he has been off drugs and alcohol for 14 months. He works in a Winchester factory that makes patio decking. He graduated high school because a teacher took pity on him and let him try to make up the work he had missed. More than six years after graduating, Gardner hopes to go to college to study psychology.

Research shows marijuana users are significantly less satisfied with the quality of their lives than non-users, a revelation "as telling as any very fancy story of molecules," Volkow says.

Yet, she says, "I think there is a general sense that marijuana is a relatively benign drug and does not produce addiction." Although over the past decade, "research clearly has provided unequivocal evidence that … some people can become addicted to marijuana."

Stephens has conducted seven large treatment studies of marijuana dependence, or addiction. "There's never any shortage of people who meet this definition," says Stephens, who edited the 2006 book Cannabis Dependence.

Pot as predecessor

Pope has studied heavy marijuana users, whom he defines as having smoked pot at least 5,000 times, or once a day for nearly 14 years. On average, his subjects, ages 30 to 55, reported having smoked marijuana 20,000 times.

Pope required the volunteers to abstain from smoking pot for 28 days and used urine samples for confirmation.

"We had them rate various symptoms on a day-by-day basis," he says. "We were able to show there is a clear withdrawal syndrome."

His research found the most common symptom of marijuana withdrawal was irritability, followed by trouble sleeping and loss of appetite. Symptoms began to subside after a week and disappeared by the end of two weeks.

"We've had some people in our study who reported quite a lot of craving. They were quite miserable not being allowed to smoke marijuana," Pope says, although "certainly, one does not see craving even remotely to the degree you would … with heroin or alcohol or cocaine."

Marijuana today is more potent and therefore more toxic than marijuana grown in the 1970s, Volkow says. Back then, she says, plants typically contained only 2% THC. Today, she says, marijuana plants typically contain 15% THC.

Even if today's marijuana is more potent, Stephens says, he's not convinced that makes a difference.

"The evidence of its increased potency is overrated," he says. Samples of marijuana grown in the 1970s might have appeared to be less potent than they actually were because they weren't fresh when tested. And, Stephens speculates, marijuana users might just smoke more of less-potent pot, and vice versa.

A family problem

Rachel Kinsey says drug addiction runs in her mother's family, although not in her immediate family. Kinsey, 24, started drinking alcohol at 14 and smoking marijuana at 15 — "definitely a predecessor for everything else I used." She began using Ecstasy and cocaine at 17, then heroin at 18.

"I did graduate high school, and I went off to college, but I withdrew after a month," says Kinsey, of Richmond, Va. She used the diagnosis of mononucleosis she'd received the week before college as an excuse.

"I don't think I was ready for the responsibility, and I wanted to continue to use while I was in college. I was at the point where I just didn't care about college. I was already using heroin."

She moved in with her boyfriend and his father, both of whom used heroin. At 19, she got pregnant. She moved back in with her mother, substituted methadone for heroin and gave the baby up for adoption. Practically as soon as she delivered, she was back to using heroin.

About five months after her son was born in May 2003, Kinsey entered inpatient addiction treatment. During the 30-day program, she became involved with a man who went back to using cocaine after ending treatment. Kinsey says she didn't want to go back to using cocaine or heroin, "but for some reason I thought it was OK to drink and go back to smoking weed."

When she turned 21 in fall 2003, "it was off to the races. For some reason, I felt (turning 21) gave me the right to drink if I wanted to."

From January to August 2004, Kinsey says, she was charged three times with driving under the influence of alcohol and marijuana.

'Not worth the risk'

With the help of another stay at a treatment center, Kinsey hasn't used drugs or alcohol since Aug. 25, 2004, the day after her last DUI arrest. She's halfway toward graduating from nursing school and works as a nurse tech in a hospital. For the first time, she has signed a lease on an apartment and pays rent.

She can't drive until September 2008 and then only to work, to school and to 12-step meetings.

If she had to do it all over again, she says, she never would have started smoking marijuana.

"You never know where it's going to lead you," she says. "You don't know that you're not going to become an addict, so it's not worth the risk."
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Scare tactics Sanctus

Because there's some social stigma attached to smoking cannabis, the actual numbers of people imbibing is very unlikely to be the quoted or "statistical" numbers. It is for complex multi-celled creatures like human beings, and a wide spectrum of animal species entirely "normal" to consume mind alterning substances. If we're going to talk about what harms the individual maybe we should open the aperture a little and look at coffee, or sugar or nicotine or prescription drug abuse or alcohol or nasal decongenstants or ....the list is lengthy...

Citing individual "dysfunction" attributable to tetrahydracanabinol is as meaningful as citing alcohol addiction in one person and extending that experience as "truth" to the enormous numbers of people who've paid a terrible price for that particular habit...and doesn't take into consideration the far greater number who enjoy an alchoholic beverage from time to time with no long-term negative effects.

Here I'm afraid once again we're seeing a good man and a good message perverted to serve the interests of another agent who hides behind the willingness of a conditioned clergy and a conditioned populace to establish control for entirely bogus reasons. Like prohibition, the message of moderation was used by many to build massive empires of illegal trade in alcohol, while the billions in revenue that are collected by governments, and the choice of the citizenry doomed this movement to failure.

Escapism if that's the impetus behind imbibing alcohol or other controlled substances is a symptom my good fellow and until that symptom is addressed the behavior won't be extinguished...by social sanction or censure....

Painting yet another segment of the population as responsible for crime or the decline of social responsibility...is a well-worn..well used strategy. How could governments collect taxes on a plant that even a non-gardener can grow in a window box? How can the injustices of poverty and racial discrimination be energized without some evil demon..(weed..the evil demon...alcohol the evil demon) to identify?

As far as I'll go in support of 'managing' peoples choices is to comment that excess probably isn't a good policy with anything...from marijuana to nuclear missiles...
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Marijuana didn't really permeate the Kawarthas 'til the early 70's. So I missed it. The drug early on was used as a chick magnet. If you supplied you got lucky and so locally in the mid-70's 'pot girls' were a phenomenon. I don't know where they are today but I suppose they're still out there. The drug has rocketed in usage since then. Kinda sad but it's just one of many changes we've witnessed.
 

canadarocks

Electoral Member
Dec 26, 2006
233
6
18
Scare tactics Sanctus

Because there's some social stigma attached to smoking cannabis, the actual numbers of people imbibing is very unlikely to be the quoted or "statistical" numbers. It is for complex multi-celled creatures like human beings, and a wide spectrum of animal species entirely "normal" to consume mind alterning substances. If we're going to talk about what harms the individual maybe we should open the aperture a little and look at coffee, or sugar or nicotine or prescription drug abuse or alcohol or nasal decongenstants or ....the list is lengthy.....


Playing devils advocate, but is it really scare tactics, or that many of us don't want to admit we may be wrong about pot? I mean, if the study done does show what it says it shows, pretty hard to dispute the findings!
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Canadarocks

Greetings!

Like most things I believe the choice to engage in one behavior or another should be left to the individual. Now I also acknowledge that like seat-belt use for instance, sometime the great-unwashed don't really know what's in their own best self-interest and what isn't...

Have you read the Le Dain commission report? Very old and churned out at the height of cannabis hysteria...
 

marygaspe

Electoral Member
Jan 19, 2007
670
11
18
77
Canadarocks

Greetings!

Like most things I believe the choice to engage in one behavior or another should be left to the individual. Now I also acknowledge that like seat-belt use for instance, sometime the great-unwashed don't really know what's in their own best self-interest and what isn't...

Have you read the Le Dain commission report? Very old and churned out at the height of cannabis hysteria...

It would seem to me that we should make up our minds about weed in this country-either it is illegal or it is not. Go all the way one way or the other. There is too much of a grey area in this matter, like cigarettes.
 

s_lone

Council Member
Feb 16, 2005
2,233
30
48
44
Montreal
Playing devils advocate, but is it really scare tactics, or that many of us don't want to admit we may be wrong about pot? I mean, if the study done does show what it says it shows, pretty hard to dispute the findings!

I'm not sure it's a question of being right or wrong on the question of pot. Either as a country we choose that pot is dangerous and that no citizen should use it, or we accept that each citizen is responsible for managing their own consumption of the substance like we do with alcohol and cigarettes. From what I know and from my experience, alcohol is at least as dangerous if not more than marijuana. Cigarettes cause a much clearer addiction and for some strange reason, our country largely accepts that each citizen should use their own judgement concerning it. Why the difference of attitude between marijuana and cigarettes? Because of the mind-altering properties of marijuana? Then why tolerate alcohol and not marijuana? On what basis is alcohol more acceptable than marijuana, apart from a legal point of view?
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
I think I would call it a gateway drug. Similarly we could call alcohol or nicotine a gateway drug, once you try beer or cigarettes, the act isn't much different from trying pot. It's experimentation. Once you smoke pot on a somewhat regular basis, it's only a matter of time until one of the dealers you visit has something else to offer. That's one reason I am for legalization.

On the addiction front this reminds me of a thread about will power. Addictive personalities=low will power.
 

marygaspe

Electoral Member
Jan 19, 2007
670
11
18
77
I'm not sure it's a question of being right or wrong on the question of pot. From what I know and from my experience, alcohol is at least as dangerous if not more than marijuana. Cigarettes cause a much clearer addiction and for some strange reason, our country largely accepts that each citizen should use their own judgement concerning it. Why the difference of attitude between marijuana and cigarettes? Because of the mind-altering properties of marijuana? Then why tolerate alcohol and not marijuana? On what basis is alcohol more acceptable than marijuana, apart from a legal point of view?

True. I agree with your points. I don't know the answer. But I do think that if weed is to be somewhat legal, then go all the way and make it legal and tax and regulate its production like we do booze and cigarettes. OR outlaw it totally and always, just one or the other.
 

s_lone

Council Member
Feb 16, 2005
2,233
30
48
44
Montreal
True. I agree with your points. I don't know the answer. But I do think that if weed is to be somewhat legal, then go all the way and make it legal and tax and regulate its production like we do booze and cigarettes. OR outlaw it totally and always, just one or the other.

I tend to agree. Canada is hugely hypocritical on the subject. I expect more integrity from Canada.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
I suspect anyone who enjoys marijuana would not purchase it from the government. I can only imagine the tampering the government would do with the drug until the THC levels were next to nothing, leaving you with a mildy intoxicating cigarette.
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Tonnington

Nice to have your input but many many studies refute the notion of marijuana as "gate-way" drug.

Is the phenomenon of "graduating" from one drug to another a product of that particular drug or is it a move to some other perhaps harder drug...as product of dynamics in the social climate, influences from media, contact with the seamy side of life that marijuana and other drugs must necessarily find themselves in as response to social and media pressure? If you sell guns at the local flea market the gun-police will shut you down...if you sell prophylactics in a Cathoic schoolyard the nuns will have you quartered at high noon...

Society declares determines and establishes the nature and character of both the marketplace and the consumer...
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
I suspect anyone who enjoys marijuana would not purchase it from the government. I can only imagine the tampering the government would do with the drug until the THC levels were next to nothing, leaving you with a mildy intoxicating cigarette.

Durka Durka...

Greetings my friend!

In point of fact, medical marijuana is just as potent and in some strains even more potent than what's selling on the street. I've tried a variety from a neighbor who experiences pain that no pharmaceutical pain-killing agent can touch....Like WOW Man it was really really potent...
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Addendum: So potent I considered running for political office...

Luckily the effects are relatively short-term and I found my senses and went back to being a full-time anarchist...
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Tonnington

Nice to have your input but many many studies refute the notion of marijuana as "gate-way" drug.

Is the phenomenon of "graduating" from one drug to another a product of that particular drug or is it a move to some other perhaps harder drug...as product of dynamics in the social climate, influences from media, contact with the seamy side of life that marijuana and other drugs must necessarily find themselves in as response to social and media pressure? If you sell guns at the local flea market the gun-police will shut you down...if you sell prophylactics in a Cathoic schoolyard the nuns will have you quartered at high noon...

Society declares determines and establishes the nature and character of both the marketplace and the consumer...

This is the problem with marijuana. The studies show very little correlation, likely due to biases inherent in the research. My experience is anecdotal, I wouldn't have ever tried the harder drugs without having a number of dealers who were all dabbling in other drugs. Even as it were, I was somewhat reluctant to try new drugs. I would be exposed to them, and then go do a little research myself. There was a website I used to go to, where users would write down their experiences from the different drugs. Drug experiences are highly variable between users, except in the case of truly addicted individuals.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Durka Durka...

Greetings my friend!

In point of fact, medical marijuana is just as potent and in some strains even more potent than what's selling on the street. I've tried a variety from a neighbor who experiences pain that no pharmaceutical pain-killing agent can touch....Like WOW Man it was really really potent...

I wonder if the government would have 2 standards of weed if they were in the business of selling it... medical & recreational?
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Or what kind of trouble one would get in for growing his or her own.
 

hermanntrude

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jun 23, 2006
7,267
118
63
46
Newfoundland!
It would seem to me that we should make up our minds about weed in this country-either it is illegal or it is not. Go all the way one way or the other. There is too much of a grey area in this matter, like cigarettes.

surprise surprise marygaspe sees something in black and white
 

temperance

Electoral Member
Sep 27, 2006
622
16
18
Many Chronic pain sufferes are being treated with Cannibliods in Canada and with good results--so medically they dont need to smoke it --Take a pill --


What Does the Future Hold for Marijuana for Pain?
By Bill H. McCarberg, M.D.
[FONT=arial, helvetica]

Millions of people in the United States suffer from chronic pain, and much of that suffering cannot be relieved adequately by existing treatments. Patients are in desperate need of new pain management approaches. Cannabinoid medicines appear very promising, although the subject often is obscured by controversy, prejudice, and confusion in part because cannabinoids have some relation to the cannabis plant — also known by the slang term marijuana.
What scientific reasons do doctors have to think that cannabinoids actually work? Do they provide genuine symptom improvement, or do patients become intoxicated and merely think that their symptoms are reduced?
Basic research conducted over the past 20 years provides us with many answers. In the early 1990s, researchers identified the cannabinoid receptor system. This system is found in some of the most primitive animal forms on earth — it is also the most widespread receptor system in the human body.
The cannabinoid receptor system has two types of receptors:
  • CB1 receptors are found primarily in the brain, spinal cord, and periphery.
  • CB2 receptors are on the immune tissues.
Specific molecules (called endocannabinoids) are produced by the body that interact with these CB1 and CB2 receptors, much like endorphins interact with the body’s opioid receptor system. These findings initiated a new era of scientific interest and research in cannabinoids.
Numerous studies have now established that cannabinoids help lessen pain and affect a wide range of symptoms and bodily functions. Such research has also demonstrated that cannabinoids may work together with opioids to enhance their effectiveness and reduce tolerance.
This body of research has allowed cannabinoids to be informally classified into three types:
  • endocannabinoids (produced by the body),
  • phytocannabinoids (produced by the cannabis plant), and
  • synthetic cannabinoids (produced in the laboratory).
Each type is being studied aggressively, but because endocannabinoids are quickly metabolized and probably cannot be patented, they have not yet been researched in humans.
What progress is being made toward developing cannabinoids as prescription pain relievers? Some cannabinoids are unstable and many are insoluble in water, which makes them difficult to research and turn into modern medicines. Patients react very differently to cannabinoids. Data from recent clinical trials are encouraging, but somewhat mixed. Looking closely at the results suggests that composition and delivery route (i.e., how a medicine is administered) are extremely important to the viability of cannabinoid medicines.
The Delivery Route
When taken orally, cannabinoids are not very well absorbed and often have unpredictable effects. Patients often become sedated or have intoxication-like symptoms when tetrahydrocannabinol (THC—the primary psychoactive cannabinoid in cannabis) is metabolized by the liver. A small number of studies with Marinol (synthetic THC in sesame oil in a gelatin capsule) and Cesamet (synthetic THC analogue) have shown some effectiveness in pain relief, but optimal doses that relieve pain often cannot be achieved because of unpleasant psychologic side effects.
Inhaling cannabinoids, especially THC, also may cause problems for many patients. Blood levels rise suddenly and then drop off sharply. This rapid on-off effect may produce significant intoxication, particularly in patients who are new to cannabinoids. This may pose the risk of abuse potential. Smoking cannabis produces this effect, which is the very reason that recreational users prefer the inhaled route. Patients, however, generally wish to avoid psychologic effects, and it is unclear how difficult it might be to find a dosing pattern that enables them to have pain control without side effects. A new product, called Sativex, was approved by Health Canada in June 2005 for marketing as an adjunctive medicine for central neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis. Adjunctive therapy means taking two or more medications to help control pain.
[/FONT]