What?
Can you point me to exactly where he says what he thinks Trudeau's finance ministers did?
How can I search google for what this person is thinking?
Canadians will forever be indebted because of Jim Flaherty.
- Thread starter tay
- Start date
What?
Can you point me to exactly where he says what he thinks Trudeau's finance ministers did?
How can I search google for what this person is thinking?
And there you go again. Rather than tell the individual you disagree or bring about some point you throw out your stupid questions. Explain to me this? How can I that? Everyone here knows exactly what Wulfie68 is driving at, including those who don't agree with him, but you need him to clarify.
Predictable. Maybe you should work on your game a bit.
Some people here are not 60+ years old, so no, I am not fully aware of all the possible grievances levied against finance ministers in the 70's.
Asking for clarification isn't a game. How can I form a reasoned opinion on something if I don't know what the person is referring to in the first place?
There you go again.
Try by not playing dumb and do a little research. I'm not 60 and I know, as are quite a few informed folks on this site.
They just don't play the same dumb game you play.
Seriously, if you are not just going to answer the question, then shut up.
Why do you love bickering so much?
I promise you, I do not enjoy speaking with you in any way, so I wouldn't bother posting unless I was actually interested in what this person is talking about.
Are you stunned?
As mentioned, google the subject of the post.
Sorry Tay, we're still feeling the effects of Trudeau's finance ministers in the 70s.
the what?
the effects
what effects?
the effects of Trudeau's finance ministers in the 70s
https://www.google.ca/search?q=the+effects+of+Trudeau%27s+finance+ministers+in+the+70s&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US
fficial&client=firefox-a&channel=rcs&gfe_rd=cr&ei=c75KU869HqmC8QfZyoDIBANow stop bothering us.
I answered your question and I won't shut up, because your schtick (see underlined in bold) very annoying and repetitive.
Lol, are you people all mad?
What exactly does he think the finance ministers did that was bad?
Where does it say that?
Are you stunned?
As mentioned, google the subject of the post.
Sorry Tay, we're still feeling the effects of Trudeau's finance ministers in the 70s.
the what?
the effects
what effects?
the effects of Trudeau's finance ministers in the 70s
https://www.google.ca/search?q=the+effects+of+Trudeau%27s+finance+ministers+in+the+70s&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US
Now stop bothering us.
Finance ministers do a lot of different things. Did you actually read those google results? Which issue are you worried about?
Lol, yeah, you can predict that if you guys keep refusing to actually say what you are talking about, I still wont know what you are talking about.
Use your words. Why would you be afraid to tell me something like this?
Says the person who apparently can't write a simple sentence explaining something that he apparently thinks is simple and obvious.
You haven't said sweet bugger all. Rather than bring a bonafide opinion, you just stick to your laundry list and that is why even people that I have fundamentally opposed on this forum find you so annoying.
Someone says to you: This is why I think you are wrong. Your stock reply is: Why do you think I am wrong?
Trudeau spent our future. Same with Mulroney. They both spent hundreds of billions we did not have. Kerist his post was clear as daylight.