peapod said:A question jimmywhat kind of medication are you on :lol: :lol: I won't wait for your reply...I am gonna go see starwars now
![]()
Beware the dark side....oh forgot, your'e already there!! :wink: :lol:
Have a good time.
peapod said:A question jimmywhat kind of medication are you on :lol: :lol: I won't wait for your reply...I am gonna go see starwars now
![]()
jimmoyer said:But this thread is on the Canadian improvement on democracy or its embarrassments, and so I only wanted to point out that democracy in all its various flavors holds promise only in the process, the opportunity to battle.
The end result of those battles never please the great majority. Never.
And thus the tendency to split or separate manifests if one interest group does not get what it wants.
How you can create an apparatus that will encourage debate and thus slow down any progress legitimately or illegitimately, and also create an apparatus that can actually get things done is a great riddle.
Secession always lurks in democracy.
Compromise gains a disappointed majority.
There's only one bright shining institution that the Brits and Canadians have: the QUESTION PERIOD.
Press conferences and Press secretaries in America don't hold a candle to that great institution.
ottawabill said:I honestly find that it's not our system that is so much embarasing as the people in it. The class of politition in this country it very low. The U.S. senate and house are full of people how generally conduct themselves with a certain class and air where as we have shouting school brats who never think as individuals..Caroline Parish is a good example of the type I am speaking about. Doesn't seem so much a proffession anymore but rather "6 years and I get a great pension"
Reverend Blair said:It wasn't just one yahoo, Toro. In fact the original yahoo has recanted now that he's seen how inept your heroes are. The thing is that a bunch of yahoos voted with him and they actually did change the name.
you should be ashamed to have anything to do with those people...
Reverend Blair said:They should. No civilian has a purpose for a handgun. You are, once again, incorrect though Toro. You can own a handgun in Canada if you have the right permits.
History has shown time and time again that the ruling party does what it wants to do, not what it was elected to do.
why do Canadians continually accept third rate scam artists who are only interested in their party and themselves?
If you are law-abiding and have not commited any violent crime, there should be no reason one should not be permitted to own a handgun.
Your heros: Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot.
peapod said::lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Listen up people, El toro is just trying to bait us into a bar room brawl...I say don't bite...but its up to you. I am personally relieved that he has moved south, maybe we could trade him for think...
A dictatorship of the bourgeoisie is better than a dictatorship of the proletariat because at least the wealthy have a clue.