Okay, is it me or does a certain blogger use words like "fantastic" and "amazing" whenever Adam sings something on TV and "good" or "very good," or even "very, very good," (recently) when describing Kris? (Today: "Another really terrific performance of “Whataya Want From Me” from Adam Lambert and his band.") I think she did describe the live performance last Monday of Kris and band as "awesome." That's quite effusive, for her. I was rather surprised a qualifier wasn't employed, such as "relatively awesome", or "very, very good, considering his voice is just okay."
Today I read something online about Kris that described him so glowingly I actually thought, "There must be some problem." It sounded like the usual press description of Adam: "amazing vocals" "sexy" "an audience favorite" "sure to have an incredible career in music" -- etc. I'm just not used to hearing Krissofer described as anything other than, you know, satisfactory, adequate, does a lot with the little that God gave him, etc.
Most annoying, to me, though, are some of his fans online, who seem to want to apologize for liking him. "Forgive me, but I know he doesn't really have the best voice, but..." I very rarely read anything like: "Oh my God, this guy blows me away, he's brilliant." Not that I never read anything like this (in fact, much more so, lately), but it's not pervasive. I think, though, it's slowly becoming more "acceptable" to say Kris is excellent, without fear of being chastised for it. Now if we could just get mj on board that would be very, very, very, very satisfactory.