Re: RE: Canadian Forces at a breaking point
Because, my friend, we do not waste time on foolishness or trying to disprove a negative. Your selling out comment is simply not true, now, then, or in the future as PM.
BTW, why don't you pick out one slur on Harpers name and stick with it, continually changing it is foolish and pathetic.
the caracal kid said:ok... do you remember back when canada actually tried to be an innovator in aerospace? do you remember how dief caved to the US and scrapped the aero? THAT was a major step to the diminishing of the canadian military.
Won't argue with you about that, Dief was wrong, from what little I know about it.
Harpsicord and social programs:
you think he is going to fund them? he has not produced numbers. wonder why? perhaps it has to do with his "small government"/"private enterprise" agenda. Harpsicord wants the government out of pretty much everything.
Yes, I do think he will fund it. Less government in my life would be a good thing. Why pay taxes to produce something that can be produced by private enterprise?
do i have to dig up ALL the anti-quebec, anti-medicare, anti-gay, pro-big-business, pro-american statements he has made? Would you settle for a look at every one of his poilicy statements that is anti-clear-policy?
If you consider actually making Quebec accountable, go ahead. If you have a problem with a private and public health care mix, go ahead, I think it is the only way our health care system will survive. If you are talking about his support for the traditional definition of marriage, that is not anti gay, and is something I support, along with civil unions with all the attendent benefits and rights. I have no fear of the US. If you can find some of the policies in this campaign that support your claims, post em.
Harpie could not sell this country to the US fast enough for his liking. I have posted links to harie rhetoric on these forums and not a single con has tried to refute the true harpie. Why is that?
Because, my friend, we do not waste time on foolishness or trying to disprove a negative. Your selling out comment is simply not true, now, then, or in the future as PM.
BTW, why don't you pick out one slur on Harpers name and stick with it, continually changing it is foolish and pathetic.