Canada faces battle for pharmacare scheme to make medicines free

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
The gap, said Martin, was partly because Canada’s system was designed in the 1960s, when prescription medication was less of a focus for care. Today Canadians, however, face the second-highest drug costs in the industrialised world, after Americans. And they are forced to cover those costs either out of their own pockets, or through a patchwork of provincial and private drug plans.

The result has left many in Canada choosing between meeting their basic needs or complying with the doctors’ orders, said Hassan Yussuff of the Canadian Labour Congress. “If you’re not fortunate enough to work for a sizeable employer that has the resources to provide you with benefits, you’re left on your own,” he said.

His organisation, which represents labour unions across Canada, recently launched a campaign for a national pharmacare plan. “This patchwork that we have throughout the country is devastating for working Canadians,” he said. “We believe anyone with healthcare should have coverage for the medication they need.

About 700,000 Canadians – many of them in precarious or lower-paid jobs – have no prescription drug coverage at all, while another 3.6 million are believed to have coverage that falls short of allowing them to afford medications, according to estimates from the government.

“What we do know is that far too many Canadians are going without medication,” said Yussuff. “Studies have indicated they’re splitting their medication, they’re sharing their medication and in some cases not taking it.”


more

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/20/canada-national-pharmacare-prescription-drugs
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
I like to back up to look at the underlying principles in any idea like this.

I understand that insurance(private or public) is only sustainable if many people pay for the needs of a few people.ie the system is not sustainable if it is many people paying for many people.

A deductible that you pay before you are entitled to benefits has always been useful in prevent people from throwing a rock through their dirty window instead of cleaning it.

free services like a bathroom at a gas station are often shit and pissed on.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
I was behind an older lady in line at the pharmacy the other day and her bill came to $700 some odd dollars. She had about 20 things on her bill. Not sure if it was all for her or for her and her husband but I really hope it wasn't a monthly or a weekly bill for her. It isn't right.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,341
113
Vancouver Island
The guardian got half the problem right. When we got basic free medical coverage in the 60s it was designed around services available at that time. Open heart surgery was still being pioneered, joint replacement nonexistant. TOday, with a sense of entitlement the same program is expected to provide every possible medical procedure for every person.
Drugs consisted mainly of pain killers, anti infection and a few vaccines. None of which were very expensive. Now somehow the entitled demand every new expensive drug on the market.Quite simply this is unsustainable. Either drug prices have to be controlled or we provide a few of the basics and you are on your own for all the rest.