This happens every day with respect to the laws of the land... This woman's 'need' to wear a niquab during a swearing-in ceremony is just one example
My point regarding being told what one can or cannot wear was in reference to an all out ban. I would loath to see something here so heavy handed as the all out bans that have been imposed in France, for example.
Whether it's religious or cultural makes no difference to me. 99.99 ad infinitum percent of the time, anybody in this nation can wear pretty much what they want. This, I believe, should continue. My opinion, my personal opinion, is that covering the face is an overly excessive display of modesty, but I am not compelled to tell someone, in the majority of situations, that they can't do that anymore. That would be too intrusive. That said we all face some restrictions in our personal expressions, we all experience some situations where laws and/or rules will conflict with our freedoms. As long as those situations are not excessive, as long as they are applied equally and fairly amongst all members of society, then that's something we just need to live with. So a requirement to remove a face veil , which is all the niqab is primarily,during the Oath of Citizenship is not an excessive demand.As per above, this has to do only with the immigration ceremony... That's it.
What makes me shake my head is that as the law/practice is clear, if this nutbar doesn't believe that having Canadian citizenship is worth removing this headgear (in a private room with just a women no less) then exactly why does Canada want her at all?
Referring back to a point that was made multiple times in this thread, there is no religious regulation that requires her to wear this in public, so it is no different than her personal 'preference'.... And this takes us right back to what one poster made about a Klan member wanting to take their citizenship oath wearing their white hood.
Last edited: