Brzezinski's Warning Press Silent

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
[FONT=Arial,Geneva,Helvetica,Swiss][SIZE=-1]http://www.wsws.org/index.shtml
[/SIZE][/FONT]

Why is the US press silent on Brzezinski’s warnings of war against Iran?

By Barry Grey in Washington DC
3 February 2007


[SIZE=-1][/SIZE][SIZE=-1]
[/SIZE]

The major national newspapers and most broadcast outlets failed even to report Thursday’s stunning testimony by former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Brzezinski, national security adviser to President Jimmy Carter, is among the most prominent figures within the US foreign policy establishment. He delivered a scathing critique of the war in Iraq and warned that the policy of the Bush administration was leading inevitably to a military confrontation with Iran which would have disastrous consequences for US imperialism.
Most significant and disturbing was Brzezinski’s suggestion that the Bush administration might manufacture a pretext to justify a military attack on Iran. Presenting what he called a “plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran,” Brzezinski laid out the following series of events: “Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks, followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure, then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the US blamed on Iran, culminating in, quote/unquote, ‘defensive’ US military action against Iran...” [Emphasis added].
Thus Brzezinski opined that a US military attack on Iran would be an aggressive action, presented as though it were a defensive response to alleged Iranian provocations, and came close to suggesting, without explicitly stating as much, that the White House was capable of manufacturing or allowing a terrorist attack within the US to provide a casus belli for war.
It is self-evident that such testimony at an open congressional hearing from someone with decades of experience in the US foreign policy establishment and the closest ties to the military and intelligence apparatus is not only newsworthy, but of the most immense and grave import. Any objective and conscientious newspaper or news channel would consider it an obligation to inform the public of such a development.
Yet neither the New York Times nor the Washington Post carried so much as a news brief on Brzezinski’s testimony in their Friday editions. Nor did USA Today or the Wall Street Journal. All of these publications, of course, have well-staffed Washington bureaus and regularly cover congressional hearings—especially those dealing with such burning political questions as the war in Iraq.
There is no innocent explanation for their decision to suppress this story. The Washington Post on Thursday published a large page-two column and photo on Henry Kissinger’s appearance the previous day before the same Senate committee. The former secretary of state under Richard Nixon gave testimony that was generally supportive of the Bush administration’s war policy.
Moreover, the Post’s web edition carried an Associated Press report on Brzezinski’s appearance. That article introduced subtle but significant changes to Brzezinski’s speculative scenario of the road to war with Iran which had the effect of underplaying the sharpness and urgency of Brzezinski’s critique of the Bush administration. It omitted the suggestion that a terrorist attack within the US could become the justification for war, and it removed the quotation marks from Brzezinski’s talk of a “defensive” war against Iran.
The World Socialist Web Site on Friday telephoned the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal and USA Today to ask for an explanation for their failure to report Brzezinski’s testimony. None of the newspapers returned our calls.
As for the television news outlets, the “News Hour with Jim Lehrer” on PBS showed a clip of Brzezinski laying out his war scenario before the Senate committee, without making any comment. “NBC Nightly News” ignored the story entirely.
The suppression of this damning critique of the Iraq war, the conspiratorial methods of the Bush administration, and its drive to an even wider war in the Middle East is one more demonstration of the corrupt and reactionary character of the American mass media. It indicates that the establishment media is preparing once again, as in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, to serve as a sounding board for the administration’s war propaganda and lies.
See Also:
A political bombshell from Zbigniew Brzezinski
Ex-national security adviser warns that Bush is seeking a pretext to attack Iran
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
This is of no surprize to me, I have oft criticized the MSM of ignoring facts. The lack of objectivity in the MSM is criminal.

Examining and shedding light on the misguided and criminal action, known as American foriegn policy, could only help the avergae American come to terms with why their Nation is so loathed Globally.

Will the "Manifest Destiny" and Global Imperialist BS ever cease from this Adminitration. If they move on Iran, the outcome, IMHO, will be dissasterous. Their Military is spread to thin, the Indigenous peoples of the ME are already at the end ofthe rope, this act would surely set them a flame in hatred.

America needs a regime change. They need to rebuild and foster better foreign policies and associations, before they set the end of times in motion.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Great article! Brzezinski is certainly as important a figure as Kissinger when foreign affairs is the issue. We are being massaged for an attack on Iran. I can't fathom why the US feels, with the failure of its operation in Iraq, that it has the wherewithal for a successful push against Iran. But I'm just a commoner. And whoever said anything had to make sense anymore? We are leaping from danger to danger. And miracle of miracles, the US still has not sustained another major hit at home since 9/11. It's a run of good luck that every day grows shorter.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The pretext will be manufactured shortly as the pattern predicts. The Empire cannot back away, it has no reverse gear. There is no sacrifice to terrible for the attainment of full domination. More than a million souls already contemptuously snuffed, dismissed as collateral damage, a price worth paying.:wave:
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The pretext will be manufactured shortly as the pattern predicts. The Empire cannot back away, it has no reverse gear. There is no sacrifice to terrible for the attainment of full domination. More than a million souls already contemptuously snuffed, dismissed as collateral damage, a price worth paying.:wave:
Absolutely not worth it all.

The price of crude per barrel, will never lessen nor justify the lives lost in the name of globalization.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Absolutely not worth it all.

The price of crude per barrel, will never lessen nor justify the lives lost in the name of globalization.

I was sarcastically refering to Madline Albrights statement that all the dead children were worth the war in Iraq. Sorry for the misleading statement.:wave:
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I was sarcastically refering to Madline Albrights statement that all the dead children were worth the war in Iraq. Sorry for the misleading statement.:wave:
I thought as much, I was just adding to it.

The whole war is nothing more then a grab for market shares of oil.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I concure, if the current US administration is not stopped and they do infact engage in conflict with Iran. It will endange a major part of the globe.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
It does look like war with Iran this year. The carriers have been dispatched, the rhetoric begun. Now the hounds, already baying, only need to be loosed.
George must have more in his knapsack than I'm aware of. There's little left in his head.
 

PsyOp

Electoral Member
Jan 24, 2007
137
1
18
Nice article, i can't believe uncle George is thinking about invading Iran. He got the capital to do that?
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
All indications that presage a major confrontation are there. Daily reminders on American news stations of Iranian perfidy. Coverage of the Iranian threat in lead editorials, even in Canada. Physical presence and pressure from the carriers sent. Scapegoating of Iran by the White House for the failure of Iraqi policy.
It looks like the gloves are off soon but the US can't even pacify Iraq. And to begin blows with Iran and not convincingly be the winner is a sure fire recipe for huge global embarrassment.
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
America is reduced to being a pimp for the *****masters of the defense industry..

Americans don't care what happens to Iranians Iraqis or anyone except Americans....even if that means detonating explosives on top of nuclear facilities and rendering a huge amount of the world uninhabitable....it's the American way....."We have to act unilaterally to this threat and don't worry everything will be OK the radiation won't reach America..."