Actually, I see the US having problems as states begin to form coaltions, abandoning institutions in persuit of their self-interests.
jimmoyer said:Sincerely yours, Said1
he said in pontificating fashion.
Saddamites should pay more attention to the experts on the ground.ALL these failures, however, represent a form of progress. When all is said and done, Iraq today is a better place than it ever was under Saddam Hussein. Had the despot not been chased away, there could be no discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the Iraqi democratic experience so far. There would have been no such experience to start with.
Iranian author Amir Taheri is a member of Benador Associates.
This item is available on the Benador Associates website, at http://www.benadorassociates.com/article/19406
I think not said:Life was better under Saddam, I suggest we ship all the fringe left elements that make me want to puke by even advocating such an idea, to a deserted island, they can have Saddam as their King.
Then everybody is happy.
I think not said:darkbeaver said:According to John Pace, former director of the human rights office of the UN Assistance Mission for Iraq, "Under Saddam, if you agreed to forgo your basic right to freedom of expression and thought, you were physically more or less OK. But now, no. Here, you have a primitive, chaotic situation where anybody can do anything they want to anyone."
That one was a doozy. But I digress.
Life was better under Saddam, unless of course you were a prostitute, in which case your punishment would be beheading.
Life was better under Saddam, unless of course you were a relative, in which case you dissapeared.
Life was better under Saddam, unless of course you were one of 13 million Shi'a Muslims, which faced severe restrictions on their religious practice, including a ban on communal Friday prayer, and restriction on funeral processions.
Life was better under Saddam, unless you were part of the 1991 uprising and you were amongst the 250,000 dead.
Life was better under Saddam, unless you were a Kurd, in which case you get rained on with chemical weapons.
Life was better under Saddam, unless of course you happen to fall under Saddam's 988 campaign of terror against the Kurds that killed at least 50,000.
Life was better under Saddam, I suggest we ship all the fringe left elements that make me want to puke by even advocating such an idea, to a deserted island, they can have Saddam as their King.
Then everybody is happy.
sanch said:One point left unsaid here is that the US has every intention of leaving Iraq and the oil fields to Iraqis. The invasion was quick but the transition to democracy was very inept and this is why the US is still in Iraq. There are still innocents being killed by US fire but the vast majority of killing is between the insurgents, Sunnis and Shites. The US can’t leave because of the blood bath that would ensue.
These are the casualty numbers for Iraq over the last 2 years.
http://icasualties.org/oif/