Baby on Cover of Nirvana's Album "Nevermind" Suing

Hoof Hearted

House Member
Jul 23, 2016
4,254
990
113

He's alleging distress and saying the cover is child pornography.

Am I the only one who has just noticed the irony in all of this?...the fish hook with the dollar bill on it...etc.?

1629953531888.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros and taxslave

Hoof Hearted

House Member
Jul 23, 2016
4,254
990
113
I think a member from Nirvana said something like, "If you think that little baby is porn, there there is something wrong with YOU" lol!

But really. This dude is 30 years old now and just looking for a cash grab. It's arguably the most iconic baby photo in pop culture. The guy should just shut it and enjoy his notoriety.
 
  • Like
Reactions: taxslave

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,612
2,359
113
Toronto, ON
His lawyers claim the dollar bill in the pic makes the baby look like a sex trade worker.

All about $$$$$.

What do you call 1000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean? A good start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: taxslave

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
His lawyers claim the dollar bill in the pic makes the baby look like a sex trade worker.

All about $$$$$.

What do you call 1000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean? A good start.
I would call it pollution.
If that pic is now porn, what about the young girl filmed running naked down the street in Vietnam about 40 years or so back?
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
35,817
3,031
113

He's alleging distress and saying the cover is child pornography.

Am I the only one who has just noticed the irony in all of this?...the fish hook with the dollar bill on it...etc.?

View attachment 9763
all they have to do is say that they baby is transgender and cd will reach #1 in sales. 💿 💲 ;)
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,404
1,667
113
A picture of a naked person doesn't mean it's pornograpy.

Lefties don't have much commonsense.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
35,817
3,031
113
Baby on Nirvana's Nevermind cover adds new claim to lawsuit
Author of the article:WENN - World Entertainment News Network
Publishing date:Nov 23, 2021 • 13 hours ago • 2 minute read • Join the conversation
Nirvana's Nevermind album is pictured in this file photo.
Nirvana's Nevermind album is pictured in this file photo. PHOTO BY FILE PHOTO /Postmedia Network
Article content
The man who was naked on Nirvana’s Nevermind album cover as a baby claims the rockers also dressed him up as Playboy founder Hugh Hefner for the photo shoot.

Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW

Article content
Four-month-old Spencer Elden was photographed in a swimming pool, reaching for a dollar bill, for the famous image but in August, he sued the band for sexual exploitation.


He claims his parents did not sign a release authorizing the photography and terms the nude image “sexual exploitation.”

On Monday, his lawyer Robert Lewis filed an amended lawsuit with the new claim that photographer Kirk Weddle has “produced photographs of Spencer dressed up and depicted as Hugh Hefner.”

Weddle, Dave Grohl, Krist Novoselic, designer Robert Fisher, and the record executives at Universal Music, MCA Records and Geffen Records are all named in the suit, as well as Kurt Cobain’s widow Courtney Love, who is the executor of his estate. The troubled frontman took his own life in April 1994.

Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW

Article content
The amended lawsuit reiterates the original legal argument that Nirvana intended to “trigger a visceral sexual response from the viewer” by triggering “Spencer’s ‘gag reflex’ before throwing him underwater and took photos that highlighted and emphasized Spencer’s exposed genitals.”

The updated suit also references journal entries – including some purportedly from Kurt Cobain: Journals , published in 2002 – which contain a “sketch (of) the album cover in a sexual manner, with semen all over it.”

The suit reads: “In several instances the journals describe Cobain’s twisted vision for the Nevermind album cover, along with his emotional struggles, ‘I like to make incisions into the belly of infants then f*** the incision until the child dies.’”

Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW

Article content

Elden has claimed he has “suffered and will continue to suffer lifelong damages” because of the artwork.

He is seeking actual damages, or liquidated damages amounting to $150,000 from each of the defendants named in the lawsuit, attorneys’ fees and a trial by jury.

In the past, Elden has recreated the cover both as a teenager and an album – while wearing swimming trunks – for the album’s 10th, 20th and 25th anniversaries, and at different times he has described the photo as both “a positive” or something that felt like his “human rights” were revoked.

Nirvana drummer Grohl – now the frontman of Foo Fighters – has suggested the cover could be “altered” for future reissues, after Spencer requested his genitals be censored in any subsequent releases.

“I have many ideas of how we should alter that cover but we’ll see what happens. We’ll let you know. I’m sure we’ll come up with something good,” he told The Sunday Times magazine.