You may regret saying that.................And here is the obligatory shot of the moon:
![]()
I will try to limit the photos on this thread to deep space objects. I kind of wish there were a few other contributors.
Portable back pack left on Moon.
Portable Life Support Systems Backpack on the Moon (NASA, Moon, 7/17/09) on Flickr - Photo Sharing!
other photo's
Most Amazing Images from NASA on Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Good question,why was it left behind, if I remember right, they tried to remove just about everything they brought with them. Didn't want to create a trash dump.
Is much done these days on nearby astronomy (think it's called "wide field "), I don't know , been a long time.?
My son does a lot of wide field, long exposure stuff but for that you need a great telescope mount with excellent tracking which puts it out of the financial range of most of the typical back yard astronomers.
Long past a pair glorified binoculars.( I did say a long time)
I have a Meade great Polaris mount and a 5 inch Maksutof reflector. I've had bigger telescopes but for the last couple years it has been important that I be able to lift the damn thing. Auto-guiding adds a whole new level of sophistication and cost.
Oh, I can believe that,and yet there is this older dude (WELL retired) who has built his second reflector ,packs it into his car every useable ( or even a hint of one) day, and has discovered several comets.His scope is a rough looking bugger,and damn near as big as him.
BTW ,Thanks for the images,my screensaver collection has gotten MUCH bigger,You've reminded me on the subject, I may need to look into it again.
Maybe you can get a subsidy from the Canadian Space Agency ( a forklift)
My last scope was a 10 inch classical cassegrain reflector It was a home built so it was heavy. The mount and tripod weighed just under eighty pounds. The telescope tube assembly was another sixty. Sixty pounds doesn't sound heavy until you have to lift it up and put it on the mount, in the dark. My current scope weighs a total of forty pounds.
I would think with the advances in material science they could do better than that.
Perhaps I should strike the sentence above, perhaps a better uh delivery system is called for.....
Something to think about, especially when they can come up with systems to allow the disabled to move (no matter how poorly, a improvement is a improvement)
BTW would you welcome links to telescopes from a historical basis?
I'm having to rebuild my bookmarks but I found this:
Make: Online : In the Maker Shed: Newton's Reflecting Telescope Kit
kinda nifty , I may need to look into it myself