Are the .1% are shooting themselves in the foot by hording.

[French Patriot]

Are the .1% are shooting themselves in the foot by hording.

Presently, the rich preside over a demographic pyramid that is top shaped and de-stabled.

Ironically, because the rich have put themselves so far from the base, they themselves have become the most unstable part of the pyramid. This is not good for the rich.

Trickle down, an economic concept which is what we all live in, if increased would remedy the stability problem.

With the world below being de-stabilized by the rich, due to their distance from the bottom, and the rich knowing the benefits of stability, would be well advised to lower its demographic position and bring profits to the whole demography.

To the rich, with profits to all being possible, I would ask, what are you waiting for?

Regards
DL

 

[darkbeaver]

The big circle always goes like this, they rise and then fall into Babylon, good times bad times now you;ve seen them all. Let the cycle be unbroken.

The good times are just arround the corner in all the fairey tales.

 

[French Patriot]

The big circle always goes like this, they rise and then fall into Babylon, good times bad times now you;ve seen them all. Let the cycle be unbroken.

The good times are just arround the corner in all the fairey tales.

The rich always pay for the party.
The point is, they would bring profit to all of us if they spent more.


Regards
DL

 

[Danbones]

subtract the criminal gains and the question might not come up at all

 

[French Patriot]

subtract the criminal gains and the question might not come up at all

That is it's own problem.


If we got rid of regressive V A Ts we would not need to care so much about how the rich screw up the economy by not adding to the wealth that is in circulation.


It is the hoarding of the rich that hurts us.


Regards
DL

 

[Durry]

^^ I think you're an idiot and you don't have a clue of what you are talking about.