I have never once tried to debunk anything anyone has ever said regarding Bush and his hawks. I think his 8 years in office will bring my country back another 10 on top of that. Everyone is entitled to their political opinions, all I can do is offer my own.
But Jo, lets get serious here for a moment. When 12 year old children wear t-shirts in Canada with anti-american rant written all over it, that didn't come from their knowledge of international politics. I'm well aware of the schools curriculum in Canada. I actually sat in a class once while the teacher played "Talking to Americans" as documentary evidence of American stupidity when this is "intended" as a comedy show. This was at the Humberview Secondary School in Bolton, Ontario.
Then you have the infamous war of 1812, where Canadians burned down the white house. Did you just hear what I said? Canadians? Correct me if I'm wrong, but Canadians didn't even exist till 1947 with your citizenship act. You were regarded as British subjects until then. Why is there a need to distort history? Why do people get on TV (no, not american shows) on a talk show and ask why isnt the war of 1812 taught more extensively in schools? And the Professor (I would use another word here If I didn't think it would be censored), basically tells the parents, "Well, we can't do that, they're just waiting for an excuse to give it another shot!" :?
We're waiting for an excuse to invade CANADA!!!!??!?!?!?!? FFS!
No Jo, I disagree, I can go on and on and on. You may not feel that way, but it is all around you. I see it every single time I'm there. There is nothing subtle about anti-americanism in Canada. It is rampant to the degree it's become natural to you, as a second national obsession next to ice hockey. And in fact it is the last acceptable sign of bigotry in Canada.
I'm going to give you one last example of this, In 2002, an American fighter pilot flying his F-16 jet over Afghanistan mistakenly dropped a large bomb on a group of Canadian soldiers when he mistook their live-fire exercise for an attack on his aircraft. What was really striking was the difference in coverage of the incident between the Canadian press and the American press: in Canada, it was a huge scandal with big front-page newspaper articles and angry speeches in parliament, while in the United States it was much more subdued. It is not that Americans did not care about the issue, in fact the response here was pretty much the same as would have happened if the pilot had dropped a bomb on a bunch of American soldiers: he was tried before an American court martial, found guilty of dereliction of duty, and punished. Americans realized that, while the incident was tragic, it is not the first time a soldier has been killed by "friendly fire" and will certainly not be the last.
Now for those Canadians reading this, think about this scenario: if it was a Canadian fighter pilot who dropped that bomb, would there have been such an outcry? I think not. I suspect if it were a Canadian pilot, the response would have been much more muted, and probably about the same level as we saw here in the United States. But, the fact that it was an American pilot meant that many Canadians perceived it as an attack on all Canadians by the whole United States, and took personal offense when Americans did not see it the same way.
Am I wrong with all this?