Abortion is wrong no matter what! Part 2

hermanntrude

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jun 23, 2006
7,267
118
63
46
Newfoundland!
this is why relgion and government should be separate. if the church wants things one way or another they can preach it to their followers but they should not be able to demand that it become law
 

marygaspe

Electoral Member
Jan 19, 2007
670
11
18
77
this is why relgion and government should be separate. if the church wants things one way or another they can preach it to their followers but they should not be able to demand that it become law

As it suits society, right? Every law we have in the west arrived to us through biblical teachings, so now we are to pick those things we want or don't want, right?
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Im kinda torn here..Im against abortion..but for killing babies..decisions..

I think the debate would be more civil if people had to refer to their position in a negative way "Im Pro-Baby Murder!/ Pro-Female Slavery!" and the opposing position in the nice neat sanitized "Pro-Choice/Pro-Life". The question isn't pro-choice or pro-life, everybody likes both of them. The question is whats more important, living enslaved or being dead but free.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
As it suits society, right? Every law we have in the west arrived to us through biblical teachings, so now we are to pick those things we want or don't want, right?

Exactly, it should be society that dicates what the laws should be, not a piece of fiction from 2000 years ago...
 
  • Like
Reactions: hermanntrude

eh1eh

Blah Blah Blah
Aug 31, 2006
10,749
103
48
Under a Lone Palm
I told Rawisbetter, in another one of his inflamatory thresds, he would be more comfortable south of the Mason-Dixon Line. Bye Bye Raw. Go to your right wing, religious zealot, intollarent hillbillies. You will fit right in.:pukeright:
 

blugoo

Nominee Member
Aug 15, 2006
53
0
6
I told Rawisbetter, in another one of his inflamatory thresds, he would be more comfortable south of the Mason-Dixon Line. Bye Bye Raw. Go to your right wing, religious zealot, intollarent hillbillies. You will fit right in.:pukeright:
]

For accusing another person of being intolerant, you sure don't welcome views that differ from your own...

How curious.
 

m_levesque

Electoral Member
Dec 18, 2006
524
10
18
Montreal, Quebec
]

For accusing another person of being intolerant, you sure don't welcome views that differ from your own...

How curious.

It's always like this with anti-Church people, they scream about the intolerance of the Church and refuse too acknowledge their own intolerance.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
It's always like this with anti-Church people, they scream about the intolerance of the Church and refuse too acknowledge their own intolerance.

I'm tolerant of the bible thumping crowd until they start preaching their self righteous morals to everyone...
 

AmberEyes

Sunshine
Dec 19, 2006
495
36
28
Vancouver Island
It's always like this with anti-Church people, they scream about the intolerance of the Church and refuse too acknowledge their own intolerance.

Can't say I know too many anti-church people. I know many who disagree with the church, but I wouldn't say they're out-right anti-church.
 

eh1eh

Blah Blah Blah
Aug 31, 2006
10,749
103
48
Under a Lone Palm
]

For accusing another person of being intolerant, you sure don't welcome views that differ from your own...

How curious.

It is more a case of, Canada is a free country, so if someone wants an abortion it is none of your business. Or do you want your civil rights taken from you as well comrade.
 

m_levesque

Electoral Member
Dec 18, 2006
524
10
18
Montreal, Quebec
It is more a case of, Canada is a free country, so if someone wants an abortion it is none of your business. Or do you want your civil rights taken from you as well comrade.

How much is none of our business in Canada? Is it none of our business if a mother murders her day old baby because she changed her mind?
 

eh1eh

Blah Blah Blah
Aug 31, 2006
10,749
103
48
Under a Lone Palm
It's always like this with anti-Church people, they scream about the intolerance of the Church and refuse too acknowledge their own intolerance.

K-dude. I am not anti church. There is a church across the street from my house and I tollorate it just fine. Unlike your intollerance I do more than just tollerate. I accept their fundemental rights to practice their religion and conduct themselves to those morals. I only ask that all the citizens of Canada would be accepting and not just tollerant.
So if you don't want to have an abortion then don't. Just please accept that Canada is a free country. There are many things I don't beleive in but I don't impose my beleifs on others the way the zealot right does.
Again, I think the hillbillies are callin' yu.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
As it suits society, right? Every law we have in the west arrived to us through biblical teachings, so now we are to pick those things we want or don't want, right?
Right. We always have. Read the rules for correct behaviour in Leviticus and Deuteronomy lately? Many of them would get you into serious trouble with the law these days. Stoning adulterers and rebellious children to death, murdering people who work on Sundays... Our laws don't come from biblical teachings and they never have, we pick what suits us based on existing social conditions and mores. Your claim is just a post hoc rationalization.
 

hermanntrude

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jun 23, 2006
7,267
118
63
46
Newfoundland!
Originally Posted by marygaspe
As it suits society, right? Every law we have in the west arrived to us through biblical teachings, so now we are to pick those things we want or don't want, right?

Have you ever considered that the bible might actually contain things which are outdated and/or wrong?