A solution to the problem of Quebec

Researcher87

Electoral Member
Sep 20, 2006
496
2
18
In Monsoon West (B.C)
No, it is enshrined in law in both countries it is orginally traditional Aboriginal territory and making moves like this, could not occur because it is against the law in both nations.
 

dekhqonbacha

Electoral Member
Apr 30, 2006
985
1
18
CsL, Mtl, Qc, Ca, NA, Er, SS,MW, Un
Durka Durka


My dreams of an Imperial Federation is to re-unite English speaking nations into one supper power in terms of Military and a super power in terms of Finance. ...
why not include USA, India, Pakistan, South Africa, France, Germany, Russia, Haiti, Jamaica, etc?
then, it would be super-power in all sences, military, economy, trade, culture?
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
No, it is enshrined in law in both countries it is orginally traditional Aboriginal territory and making moves like this, could not occur because it is against the law in both nations.


Making moves like what? The Russians owned Alaska and sold it to the US. If you're going to start with Native claims, I suggest you take the first step and move.
 

General James Wolfe

Nominee Member
Oct 30, 2006
82
0
6
Canada and America belong to people of

English decent
Scottish decent
Irish decent
Welsh decent

Acadia (Alaksa with the panhandle) will belong to people of

French decent


The Americans will oblige to have their hated French be moved to as far a way from America in North America as possible. Time for the French Canadains who dont like living under English Canadains to leave to this promise land of Acadia in the far north of North America.

I unlike other British Nationalists dont want French expelled in North America but relocated to Acadia (Alaska with out the panhandle) where they wont break up Canada or cause trouble in Canada.


General James Wolfe defeated the French in Quebec fair and square to claim Quebec for English, Scottish, Irish and Welsh settlers. The people of British decent in Canada must not give up the territory of Quebec if they do they will be betraying the memory of General Wolfe and his soldiers who fought for the British to claim Quebec.


We British Nationalist stand behind English Speaking Canadians.

Dot surrender Quebec.
 

dekhqonbacha

Electoral Member
Apr 30, 2006
985
1
18
CsL, Mtl, Qc, Ca, NA, Er, SS,MW, Un
do the earth belong to someone?
i don't think so.
the land is given, it's a paradise on earth, we must share it, must live on it.

If we look whom the land belonged according to history, then, all europe, america, asia, oceania, and africa didn't host anyone. So, no one should live on earth? that what i get from your logics.
maybe, i'm too stupid to think this way, but, there is not other way around it.
 

Sassylassie

House Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,976
7
38
ITN let General Wolfe own Alaska for a while cause he makes me laugh. I'll give you Quebec okay. No please don't thank me, it's the least Canada can do for all the help the US has given Canada. Poutine is a god awful mix of French Fries gravy and cheese all gooed together and called a cultural food. It hit's the pit of your tummy like lead. Again thankyou for taking Quebec off our hands, godbless the US.
 

General James Wolfe

Nominee Member
Oct 30, 2006
82
0
6
SassyLassie


I dont want to own Alaska. This post was not meant to be funny. I made this post as an idea on solving the issue of Quebec and for a need of a French homeland in North America. Their can be a French homeland in North America but not in Quebec, the only other opiton is Alaska which would be ranamed Acadia. Six Million Francophones can fit very nicely in Alaksa whle the English Alaskans can fined new homes in British Columbia and Quebec.


As I said the Francophones would be gaining more than what the Anglophones would be gaining. Alaska would be alot wealthier on its own than would be Quebec. I wish that after the 7 years War (French and Indian War) that the British gave Alaska to the French of North America that would have solved the issue of French troubles in Canada. But its no to late to do what is right for both the Anglophones and Francophones of North America.



If some Francophones want to stay in Canada the that would be fine as long as the understand that Canada is an Anglophone Country and it will not tollerate trouble. Acadia would not only be a French homeland for Quebecers but also a homeland for disgruntled French Louisananians.


Lucian Bochard can become the First President of the French homeland of Acadia.


LONG LIVE A STRONG AND UNITED CANADA


English Canadians fight for the unity of Canada and fight against Quebec Nationalism. Quebec is an interal part of Canada.


I say Quebec is a part of Canada today
I say Quebec is a part of Canada tomorrow
I say Quebec is a part of Canada forever
 

s_lone

Council Member
Feb 16, 2005
2,233
30
48
44
Montreal
You poor english folks! There is a terrible flaw in your little devious plan... Didn't you know that the axis of the Earth will change in 2012?

Ottawa will become the new North Pole and the climate in "Alaska-Quebec" will suddenly become very comfortable with very very mild winters... you'll all want to immigrate to the new and wonderful Acadia... Except that you'll have to learn French and get a lobotomy to make sure you forget your English...

Geez! Stop drinking so much tea and start reading some books!
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
You poor english folks! There is a terrible flaw in your little devious plan... Didn't you know that the axis of the Earth will change in 2012?

Ottawa will become the new North Pole and the climate in "Alaska-Quebec" will suddenly become very comfortable with very very mild winters... you'll all want to immigrate to the new and wonderful Acadia... Except that you'll have to learn French and get a lobotomy to make sure you forget your English...

Geez! Stop drinking so much tea and start reading some books!

Don't spoil our fun!!
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
Québec Not Going Anywhere

The Province of Québec isn't going anywhere, anytime soon.

The Supreme Court of Canada, under The Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, P.C., the Chief Justice of Canada, has indicated that Québec cannot secede from Canada on its own. The Constitution Acts, 1867–1982, apply to Québec just as they apply to the several other Provinces of Canada.

In order for Québec to secede from the union, the House of Commons must consent, the Senate of Canada must consent, the Legislative Assemblies of the Provinces must consent (at least seven Assemblies, representing at least one-half of the Canadian population, excluding the population in the Territories of Canada), and Her Excellency The Right Honourable Michaëlle Jean, C.C., C.M.M., C.O.M., C.D., the Governor General of Canada, must consent to the amendment. (The House of Commons can enact an amendment notwithstanding the Senate's objections, if the Provinces consent and the Commons adopts such an amendment again after one hundred eighty days have passed.)

Citizens of Canada in Québec, just as those anywhere else on the Canadian landscape, are subjects of Her Majesty Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada. One must not forget that even if an amendment were to pass through the Parliament of Canada unopposed, Her Majesty is granted the power to annul such an amendment within two years of its passage (as per Section 56 of the Constitution Act, 1867), which some (such as myself) would argue would be a responsibility rather than an option, in the case of Québec secession. Québec is an entirely-bound party to the Constitution Acts, 1867–1982, and cannot secede without doing so within the framework thereof.

Long live a strong Québec in a vibrant and united Canada!
And long live The Queen of Canada.
 

s_lone

Council Member
Feb 16, 2005
2,233
30
48
44
Montreal
You just won't get it Five Paradox eh?

Quebecers are more than willing to respect democracy. Not MONARCHY. Keep the nice old lady and her representants out of this.
 

ottawabill

Electoral Member
May 27, 2005
909
8
18
Eastern Ontario
omg

OMG I actually agree with S_, how dd that happen? You do know Mr. Quebec, that most of the country would also agree with you. There are only a few in this country who could care less if we had a Queen or not. I would well imagine there will be a debate about continuing the role in Canada once she dies.

I think at present the Queen does not rub anyone the wrong way nor do she have any affect in Canadian life, therefore no one cares so stir up the pot..But wait for Prince Chucky Cheese and see what people say!!

Beyond any of this though, you can be stired up easily can't you..this whole thread is fun a games and you are getting red, purple and green..lighten up dear friend!!
 

General James Wolfe

Nominee Member
Oct 30, 2006
82
0
6
If the Jews of Europe and the Middle East can transfer to Israel (Palastine) from 1932-1950, then so can the French of North America can transfer to Acadia (Alaska with out the panhanle) can too. Time for the French Canadians to go to their Israel (Acadia) in North America. Your hero Lucian Bouchard can be made the first President of Acadia.


Once in Acadia the Francophnoes can have their language police and they want have to worry about the Anglophone Canadiain courts interfering. Rember Francophones if you chose to go to Acadia (Alsaksa with the panhandle) you will be gaining 90.651 Sq miles of territory. The size of Acadia will be 614.903 Sq miles bigger than all of the former French possesions of Canada. You Francophones will be gaining more land while we Anglophones will be getting less land.


Which Francophone does not like the idea of gaining land while Anglophones loosing land.
 

ottawabill

Electoral Member
May 27, 2005
909
8
18
Eastern Ontario
could send them to New Orleans, like we were going to do in the first place...I here there is cheap housing there, as many residents left and did not come back!!
 

General James Wolfe

Nominee Member
Oct 30, 2006
82
0
6
Ottawabill

New Orleans is part of America another English speaking nation. I want to keep the lower 48 states a part of America while I support the independence of Hawai and for the Hawian Monarchy restored to the Kingdom of Hawai. I suppor the creation of a French homeland in Acadia (Alaska with out the panhandle). It would be tempting to give New Orleans to the Francophones but not fair to the Anglophones of New Orleans to loose their homes even if they are in disrepair.
 

ottawabill

Electoral Member
May 27, 2005
909
8
18
Eastern Ontario
but the U.S could sell it back to the french and make a substantial profit.. they bought the whole mid west for 15 million, they can sell back New Orleans for more then that..Hell the present administration in washington would consider it a great savings..it is costing more then that put the city back in shape..They can sell it back as is to it's previuos owners!!
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Ottawabill

New Orleans is part of America another English speaking nation. I want to keep the lower 48 states a part of America while I support the independence of Hawai and for the Hawian Monarchy restored to the Kingdom of Hawai. I suppor the creation of a French homeland in Acadia (Alaska with out the panhandle). It would be tempting to give New Orleans to the Francophones but not fair to the Anglophones of New Orleans to loose their homes even if they are in disrepair.

You're certifiable, must be that British smugness oozing through the computer.