PROThat brought up many valid points about statistics and tweaking them, and I was happy
CONThen it used many of the same methods to tweak statistics (and not to demonstrate, it did so honestly believing it was valid) to refute the point.
I see that alot in statistical debates though. "You are massaging the numbers becaues X, Y and Z, here is the truth because Z, Y and X!"
arg. Snopes you sadden me.
