Re: RE: 9/11: Debunking The Myths
jimmoyer said:
There's no responsibility in this thread, because
none of us bear the burden or consequence if we're
wrong.
Several common mistakes are made here.
If a question has gotten no answers, what does that
mean to you all ? Does it automatically mean what ?
If forensics is lacking, does it automatically mean
incompetence ? Or conspiracy ?
Incomptence in 9-11 ok, but wouldnt be normal , there would have reprimend from those who were incompetent that day?? none of this happen.
classified suspected terrorist financial to 9-11 widow, is incompetence??
confiscating pentagone video from the public is incompetence?
Refusing independant comission on 9-11 to be formed is incompetence??
Putting the blame on bureaucracy and incomptetence is way too easy.We will never solve the problem if we put the blame on institution and incompetence.
jimmoyer said:
Why do the conspiracy theorists automatically
undervalue the motive of al Qaeda ?
First alquada blow up train,cars, bus, club, but never did hijacking, except on 9-11.
Motive yes, but not of them were good pilot,the pilot that crashed in the pentagone, wasnt even able to pilot a cesna, according to his instructors.But on 9-11 he was able to fly for 45 min, withouth being intercept, even though the whole world knew already that 2 plane crashed in the wtc, was able to find washington from where they hijacked the plane, and from 10 000 feet in the air, did a 190 degree turn, flew 4 feet over the ground at 400 mph(where only experimented pilot could do),and crashed into the pentagone,so how is this possible withouth allah help??lol, sorry i couldnt help it. tell me who is naive enough to swallow this??
jimmoyer said:
Why is it assumed that any mistake in forensics
is automatically assigned to conspiracy rather than
incompetence or confusion ?
Do the conspiracy theorists find their suspicion
of the American government more convenient for
their ongoing bias ?
Is it not the hardest thing in the world to deal
with questions that challenge our own prejudicial view ?
I'm quite suspicious of our government, but more
for reasons of turf battles, incompetence, midlevel
management ruined by bureaucratic procedure,
careerists protecting their jobs, than I am of their
ability to coordinate more than an army of one or of
their ability to keep a secret amongst those allegedly
in a plot.
Raising questions is no proof of anything. It's only proof
that a question is unanswered, not any more than that.
At least you dont trust your governement, which is a good step, and you are doing the right thing.
The only thing i know about this event, is there is no evidence that alquada is behind it, except we saw , distortion,obstruction and covering up the event from the bush administration.
I even called 3 different demolition compagny in quebec, to ask them what they think of wtc collapse, and all of them agree that only explosive can bring building the way the wtc's fell, but only one believed in the governement conspiracy, the others one think, alquada planted the explosives by themselves in the buildings.
