Well, as an Albertan I call BS that anyone would consider saying any of these statements any kind of taboo violation. Personally I don't agree with much of it:
1. I've never felt the urge to read Margaret Atwood, thus I can't comment if she is a decent writer or not.
2. In the absence of proof to back up this claim, I'll disagree. Intuitively, reusing and recycling resources = conservation = good thing.
3. Partially disagree. I think the private sector has a place in health care but it is not a be-all and end-all. I think that the Canadian system delivers better protection to the populace as a whole than the American one. 2 stats support this view: first is the leading source of bankruptcy in the US is medical bills, second is the sheer number of people (the working poor) who cannot afford health care but make too much money to be eligible for government subsidized healthcare.
4. I think David Suzuki is a blowhard and an alarmist, but he serves a purpose in that he forces us to examine our actions. I don't agree with many of his conclusions and supposed solutions but the discussions are often worthy exercises.
5. I agree: I don't think a national daycare plan would solve much of anything.
6. Not a big art person, so not qualified to comment.
7. I agree to an extent. The US is a more benevolent force than China. For all its warts, the US has proven that it is willing to help other peoples and nations across the globe. India may evolve this way but I'm not sure, given some of the cultural and religious baggage. China has been expansionist and xenophobic and its current dictatorships view human rights as optional.