Search results

The barreleye fish, L. Macropinna microstoma, was first described in 1939 and has baffled physiologists for decades. The barrelfish belongs to the Opisthoproctidae family, and they are sometimes referred to as spook fish. The fascinating aspect of these fishes is the tubular eyes. The fish has...

+/-100= a range of 200, despite Scott's objections otherwise Why not ramble on some more about correlations, and show us what you know about those mathematical models. :lol:

Damned 'skeptics' can't even keep their stories straight. Temperature rises are supposed to precede increasing carbon dioxide concentrations by 800-1000 years. 1400 to the late 1800's where carbon dioxide begins to rise is only 400 years... Ah well, when you don't have real hypothesis tests...

Winter... YouTube - Climate Denial Crock of the Week 1/21/09

MP accuses Tories of campaign to discredit Tim Naumetz THE CANADIAN PRESS OTTAWA –...

No, we absolutely can say that humans have contributed to warming the planet. We can say this because we know things like the radiative properties of molecules that are opaque at various wavelengths, due to their rotation, vibration, and vibro-rotational states. We can say this also, because we...

What qualifies one to be a scientist? Depending on whom you ask, you'll probably get a different answer. For my money, a scientist is any researcher who publishes their findings. Not publish on the internet, but in a quality controlled fashion, the "peer review". Typically, this means an...

I didn't think you had anything substantive to say. You're just another Scotty. Have a good day smack.

I clearly in that post made the distinction for those who don't know, the differences between weather and climate. You can choose to take that for what it's worth. I don't think you can be convinced otherwise on what the differences are. I doubt it. But you won't. Or hold your breath til mommy...

So, did you learn anything about climate, weather, trends, noise, and expected outcomes? Or are you twisting my words into some kind of strawman?

It fits my purposes fine. It shows that temperature at the earth's surface is very noisy. If you want me to explain my point another way, lets try a simple example. The trend now is about 0.17 degrees per decade. The trend for rolling a seven with two dice over time would be 0.1667, pretty much...

No, and it's not really relevant to whether the earth is warming or not. Surely you can use Google? How did you find the article in the first place? He talks now about things happening that he hasn't published. Try google scholar, read the abstracts.

May cool, he said may cool, and because it happened before... And if you search his publication record, you won't find him saying that at all. That, you should be skeptical of.

Still waiting...:smilebox:

I never called you stupid Smack. I insinuated that you're being duped, but that doesn't make you stupid. I'm asking questions that you should be asking. Where is his physical basis for making those claims? Where is the explanation for the cooling stratosphere if greenhouse gases aren't the...

No, you bought the spin. I've got some property in Saskatchewan you might be interested in too. Great ocean view.

It's especially ilarious that he gives no physical basis for this impending ice age, other than "it's happened before". Real solid evidence there Smack. :lol:

Only if you don't know the difference between climate and weather. You folks are being punked :-P

Or, the world's glaciers continue to shrink Bloomberg.com: Science