Search results

Glass house. Here's an interview Fritz gave to Der Spiegel: Breaking Global Warming Taboos: 'I Feel Duped on Climate Change' - SPIEGEL ONLINEThe long version of the IPCC report does mention natural causes of climate change, like the sun and oscillating ocean currents. But they no longer...

Yes, and NC has some low areas that could end up a meter below sea level. If they plan accordingly it's not so difficult. If they plan like dumb asses and ignore facts, well then they're just planning to fail.

If you don't see it with your own eyes, it aint real....lmao Oxygen is fake. Radiation, fake. lol

Doesn't look like Santa's company is too happy there spaminator. :lol:

Hmm, funny how much has changed since April. The graph you posted updates Walt. Now well below 2007. Well below 2 standard deviations of the long-term average as well: Ice area dipping as well:

They do. Good graphs are just depictions of the data. When you have a huge data set it can be difficult to make sense of any interesting trends the data is showing. If you're talking about changes over time, it's important to be able to see how the variable of interest changes over time...

That's called...weather. If you document the time of those events over many years, decades, then you're talking climate. Your assertion that there is no pattern in Eureka's long term temperature records is plainly wrong.

Yes...it only gets cold in winter and warm in summer at the end of that time series. When you were a kid there was no such thing as summer and winter... Ridiculous. You may not be blind, but you ought to get those eyes checked. Those are yearly averages.

No pattern at all? Well the mish mash of data you presented contains all sorts of different types of data. If you weren't so down on graphical representation of the data, you might actually be able to see a pattern. Here's the Eureka station data from 1947 to present: You would have to be...

Some interesting research out this week supports a hypothesis that was recently proposed for idiopathic Autism, which in laymen's terms refers to a genetic predisposition towards Autism of an individual and an unknown environmental trigger. Not all Autism has unknown causes, which is an...

So I just happened across this story from Houston, and I was wondering if there are any laws like this in Canada still? Maybe some local laws, or some provincial ones? Maybe there are some truancy laws and you just never hear of it? I read it and thought WTF? The laws the law, but it seems a...

What's the publication? For your information, I'm 30, and work at a big pharmaceutical company. The reports I write don't get published in journals, but they do get peer reviewed. The last one was the best set of efficacy data my director has ever seen, in his words. The first time I was peer...

So, you can see infrared radiation trapped by gases? I ran into someone at university one evening who claimed similar things. Then he muttered something about brain slugs. Umm yes. A warming planet means rising seas. You can see the effect, but apparently not the cause. The great thing about...

Can you see the difference between 1 and 3 watts from on top of your Cat? You move dirt. Some people study climate. Big difference.

The data do not agree with you: http://denverclimatestudygroup.com/OTHER-MISC/ArcticCoolingScience200909041236.pdf I'll paste the abstract:The temperature history of the first millennium C.E. is sparsely documented, especially in the Arctic. We present a synthesis of decadally resolved proxy...

Thanks for posting it again, I missed some hypocrisy over the feigned outrage in my first post addressing Levant's nonsense. A writer for Forbes magazine, a magazine that calls itself a 'capitalist tool' recently wrote that if a skeptics home burns down... we shouldn't send the fire...

A link, what a novel idea! :D

Carbon dioxide alone is +1.66 W per square meter.

No it doesn't. The radiative impact of water vapour doesn't conflict with the radiative impact of carbon dioxide. That's ridiculous! If you add 1% more water vapour to the atmosphere, it's just going to come back out as precipitation. The equilibrium will be less than two weeks. What part of...

From irrigation? I'm supposed to take your word on it? After the bungle you dropped about scientists and where they work? :lol: Nope; I trust your word about as much as I trust politicians. To say, not very much at all.