Search results

Don'cha just love those dopey Canadians?

At least it wasn't Jane Fonda. . .

At Motel 6 he can get a clean, comfortable room for a great price!

It's a great way to weasel out when you don't want to answer the fuckin' question.

I ran into a guy. Knew I knew him from someplace, but couldn't figure it out. He was apparently familiar with the situation, because he asked "Were you in the armed forces in West Berlin in the '80s?" I allowed as I was, and he said "I read the news on AFN." That's why I recognized him and...

Nope, you're good. And I wasn't suggesting that the policy be based on extreme cases, but rather that any policy you craft should take extreme cases into account. Arguing from extremes is stupid, like the imbeciles who immediately leap to the cases of abortion as birth control, or abortion for...

Poor word choice. Make it "hermaphrodite" for "gynandromorph." I blame Trudeau. I'd blame the Greeks, but this is CanCon.

Nonsense! The Armed Forces Network has no experience nor skills with immigration policy!

Nah, what we have today is a result of failing to insist the Europeans not bring their problems with them.

I don't know. A shocking number of people don't survive the van-shopping process. . .

Thank you! And congratulations. You, who apparently have no balls in the literal sense, have more balls than the vast majority of our posters and other commenters. Next question. . . would you use the power of the state to criminalize this "atrocity?" Another question (I understand it's...

Nice, but the True Believers will declare all this 500-year-old stuff irrelevant to the modern world, then immediately turn to citing 700-year-old precedent as a reason for banning abortion.

So. . . your point is that the government shouldn't ban. . . say, meth. . . cuz Adam n'Eve? OK, your opinion is noted.

Thank you. With regard to gender-assignment surgery or therapy, at what point should the government step in?

Was he searching his soul, or searching FOR his soul?

The fall's always happy. It's the sudden stop at the end that'll get ya.

Shatner's still alive?

I don't know. That's why I asked. So far, the principle articulated seems to be that the state (the schools) can't present any ideas of which parents, or a minority thereof, disapprove. So I'm testing the limits of "parental authority." Should a parent be able to demand gender-related...

You appear to advocate "parental control" over everything: the books schools teach (or even offer), the curricula, the attitudes toward non-cis-hetero people. So, what if "parental control" includes a kid who wants something non-cis-hetero, and whose parents concur?

So. . . if a parent wants their child surgically/hormonally altered, that's OK?