Search results

... or would it just be the IPCC and UN? wow That's not a very good spin. It is you that mentioned the term "norm", not me. All I said was that scientists are frequently modifying postulations. You think this continues even after they've been found out? It sounds to me like paranoia has set in.

Opinion. Just because Anglia screwed around and the others ignored it doesn't mean the others are just as screwy. If aboriginals have dark hair, does that mean that all dark-haired people are aboriginals? It's you who said it was the norm, not me. All I said was that it happens frequently. Are...

I don't know. If you ask me how I respond to it, I would say "shyte happens" and that the ones that fudged results should have their findings investigated. That doesn't mean there should be a witch hunt and every scientist is suspect. Again, if you ask me how I would respond, I'd say, "So what...

That's pretty much what I've noticed. I've also noticed that there are a lot of people who would disagree with the majority of scientists simply because it has been known to happen that the majority can be wrong, not because the scientists' interpretation of the data is wrong. Like saying, "Oh...

Congratulations. BTW, when someone challenges my honesty, I don't take it lightly. Perhaps you may think honesty is over-rated but I don't. waaaahh :roll:

So? I doubt there's a person within reach of a news article that doesn't think Gore's an ass.

no global warming - Google Search

Why would I feel the need to justify the accuracy of a joke just on your orders? Get a grip. It's a joke. I post dozens of jokes at CanCon and I am not about to start justifying them to anyone. And if it seems to me that Walter does or has denied any warming, I don't have to prove dick because...

So have you looked at all Walter's posts? Or above quibbling over a joke?

Oh, well. It's a matter of interpretation I guess. I'm going by my overall interpretation of all the stuff Walter's posted that I have read. You are asking me for one specific statement by Walter. *shrugs*

Like I said, everything is natural.

So? That's one opinion. I think it was darkbeaver that posted a credible link to something that said ocean level had dropped, too. I simply posted another credible link that said it had risen. *shrugs*

Werll, the posts of his I looked at didn't contain specifically the words "the world hasn't warmed" but some of his posts like #4 here http://forums.canadiancontent.net/climate-change/73658-death-knell-agw-36.html seem to indicate he thinks warming is nonsense. If you want more, go look for them...

Yep. Everything is natural. Humans are natural, therefore anything we do is natural. We can naturally spill oil all over a coastline, naturally cause the nuclear radiative poisoning of hundreds of thousands of living beings, etc.

You haven't looked around, I guess. Walter, for one. He's always finding some weather report mentioning a cold snap or other.

Yup. Fools panic.

Unless you talk to Walter. He doesn't seem to think the world is any warmer than any other time in history. lol I admit it's of passing interest to me, too, but not as much as curtailing our harmful activities just because they are harmful. Like oil, for instance. IMO, it was better left in the...

So? Some predictions are off and others are accurate. Do you have a point or are you just in a trigger happy cut&paste mode again?

So you agree with me that this climate change people call global warming isn't a scam. I agree that there is a natural cycle, but I don't agree that humans haven't had an impact. Personally, I think why we have climate cycles is because of a number of factors from solar cycles, just having an...

Um, if we didn't pollute, no-one would be talking about AGW, slim. So just because it is the IPCC, all the research they have is junk. Yeah, that makes sense. Anyway, the info is available that shows climate temps over the past 500 million years. The latest period shows a glitch in the cycle...