Search results

Thanks I already knew it is +0.03 W m–2.

I know of other sources and I even posted them. Did you miss those posted sources?

CO2 is just one of the causes of increased water vapour. It's not the only is it? Are there more sources of non-temp/CO2 induced water vapour?

Was I wrong about irrigation flossy?

You're the one ignoring water vapour as a GHG. Anus of Green Gables and Flossy made an attempt to prove me wrong on a point and failed. If you were part of this you'd understand. **** off until you do understand and know what has been talked about yesterday and today.

See what I mean about jumping in in middle and not knowing the topic? I gave you the opportunity but you blew it.

See above L Gilbert.

Was I wrong?

Water vapour isn't a GHG that is more powreful than CO2?

L.Gilbert..... If I were conversing with you I'd respond to you but you're a Johnny come lately. Do you want an offical role in the converstaion? Explain how CO2 is the only way to increase atmospheric water vapour content as was stated yesterday by Anus and parroted by flossy. Here is...

I just ignore you.

He just jumps in a repeats **** like cabbagefarts does. I don't take him seriously like I do you.

Because he wasn't party to this over the past two days were you and Anus said I was wrong about irrigation increasing water vapour. Well flossy, was I wrong and what will that 1% do?

Did you notice the other two STFU long ago but you haven't?

Not much? Prove it with math. Anus and flossy won't because it ****s up the CO2 thing.

Nope. Irrigation alone adds 1% more water vapour. What will 1% increase in water vapour do to global temps?

I already posted the link Anus. Pay attention.

1% as stated by IPCC. pay attention.

Well? A 1% increase in water vapour has a far bigger impact than CO2, so what policy will reverse that?

How much cash should we ding consumers who eat irrigated foods to reverse the 1% water vapour increase??