Search results

I not arguing anything. I'm stating fact. Are you high?

What do agronomists, psychologists and economists have to do with researching , data collect and interpretation of the physical attributes of climate? None. Absolutely none.

I most certainly did look at who was counted to reach that number. It was people already convinced who published pro-AGW papers. That is why it as ridiculous as asking beer drinkers if they like beer.

Not unless it was a crop science psychologist then I'd have to listen and take him/her seriously because happy plants are my goal Sorry I don't do sarcasim in purple. So you haven't reviewed the list? There are economist/climate scientists. You might be able to relate. Just in case you...

Questions reduced to layman's terms are always harassing. There is a consensus that agrees 97%.

Did you go through the list of "climate scientists" provided? On that list, how many are directly involved in researching the mechanics of climate both past and present? Countable on one hand? What is the purpose of an agronomist or psychologist being called a "climate scientist"?

You seem to think we should be obligated to believe in something based on scenarios and no proof.

The one where one of three gases (CO2 being one of concern) aren't atmosphere reliant and the formula changes with depth and pressure in an ocean that can't compress gases to the point they precipitate as solids on the seafloor? BTW thanks for voting. I like a cold beer. One chilled with...

Or follow the papers. Being published is necessity for an associate to get tenure even if it is a psychologist drifting a global warming paper. Being published is more important to researchers than anything else. It a acedemic brownie badge.

I'm worried about being banned now I tells ya.

None of the models work with a reliable ocean current model which don't exist.

I know the mechanics of what is supposed to be happening but they lack undeniable proof of AGW happening. Not a single model works so what else do you have? A 97% consensus amongst people who have authored papers drawing a AGW conclusion? If 100 beer drinkers were asked if they liked beer...

Oh Jesus. Now your going to make poor Locutus have to clean his screen after a bursting in laughter while sipping coffee and reading your ridiculous claim? Wow. Maybe you and Peabody can find a psychologist/climate scientist that does group sessions at sliding scale rates. Oops

What part of "In your own words" baffled you? So let's converse as I asked not cut and paste somebody else's words. Which undeniable fact do you base your ardent belief upon? Lay it out.

Call up this psychologist/climate scientist to set up some sessions. He's real. Climate Science Program: Iowa State University

What denial fraud? The grounded don't want to defraud you of anything.

Well it is fact that there are psychologists who call themselves climate scientists but apparently blue balls (Cobalt Kid) denies they exist.

You forgot emotionally and mentally crippling fear.

They undeniably proved AGW in the 1800s? That too is f-cking amazing. Beyond the CO2 input formulation used as the flagship to prove anthro sourced CO2 but hasn't what do you have?

I think Cobalt kid needs to have a few sessions with a climate psychologist. Whatever the f-ck that is but there really are psychologists who call themselves climate scientists.