Search results

I see, because the folks at East Anglia that communicated those unsavory messages didn't voluntarily turn themselves in, well the entire event doesn't count? Gotcha You were there millions of years ago, were ya? That's the funny thing, there is no formal area of study that has had years to...

So, Tim Ball, PH.D, MA, BA; that has studied climatology for years is not qualified by virtue that he disagrees with the IPCC. Are ya picking up what I'm putting down here? You starting to piece the puzzle together?

I totally forgot about that... Not only does 'scientology' have the science part, but also the 'ology' component that gives it a double-extra-more-gooder basis of credibility. So, when can we expect Tom Cruise to be invited to the peer review panel?

... And you'll get a form of peer reviewed proof that supports that contention as well... The only kicker is that you have to 'review' with a true believer

In this case, groups like the IPCC failed miserably in their use and reliance on peer review. As a self appointed authority, mandated by the UN no less, they made numerous critical errors in the area of 'peer review'. Also, one of the signature scientific groups that the UN/IPCC relied upon was...

lol indeed. Tim Ball would be a 'peer'... I'm guessing that he probably isn't invited into the club though. The peer review process relative to AGW is founded on leveraging those 'peers' that are of a pre-determined view... Really, it's nothing more than a punch-line at this point. Face facts...

I'm pretty sure that the qualified candidates for 'peer' are in fact 'peer reviewed' by the likes of Gore, Suzuki and the IPCC.... Can't have any unexpected surprises, you understand

Grreeeaaaaatttt... A whole bunch of papers that one group submitted to their buddies for 'peer review'. Nothing like getting another true believer to rubber stamp your 'findings'

Peer reviewed no doubt.

Tell ya what, how about you provide the research and I'll organize the peers. I'll wager that the research doesn't get the wholesale support that the AGW movement claims as their birthright

Peer reviewed and everything, eh? Forgive me if I don't find that terribly compelling

Cool shots RCS

I too like chipotle sauce.. I've never tried making it myself, but am interested in trying.... On that note, I'd imagine that the amount of time and effort would be tough to justify when the retail cost is so low.

Have you ever tried making your own?

.. and depression; and stupidity; and arrogance

Apparently, the message has done a 180 degree turn. I guess that some folk just can't accept that.

I don't think it counts as a lie if you have your fingers crossed during peer review. ... One of those sneaky little exemptions

I forgot all about the 6 months of darkness, and really, that goes a long way in explaining why the IPCC can't hold their conferences there... The IPCC folks being purists would never ever consider using fossil fuels to generate electricity and without light, they can observe AGW.

Good question. One might also wonder why they don't choose an exotic location like Churchill Mb - they could observe the climate and the polar bears simultaneously. Maybe this has something to do with peer review... I don't think it works when the temps fall below zero

Observed in the bars of Cancun