Search results

Noooooooo never.

He's pulling a waldo. I aked if the publisher in question has a bad rep and for some reason, no reply.

Francis & Taylor have a piss poor reputation?

I could care less. 2/3 of the rate of SURFACE warming vanished *poof*. Where did it go?

Warning Avertissement Peligro Goal post moving in progress.

Warning Avertissement Peligro Goal post moving in progress.

Warning Avertissement Peligro Goal post moving in progress Land surface temperature is how hot the “surface” of the Earth would feel to the touch in a particular location. From a satellite’s point of view, the “surface” is whatever it sees when it looks through the atmosphere to the ground. It...

Hey now! :mrgreen:

Troposphere is surface or did the goal posts move?

The math is clear 2/3 of the previous rate of warming went bye bye. Holy f-ck! The entire solar in solar out global warming driver is based on watts but now it isn't? WTF? Weird!

Maybe, just maybe it explains the missing 2/3 of the rate of warming and why NASA says we have to wait for solar cycle 25 for it to come back IF it does? Does the jar theory vary if you use a higher or lower wattage of lightbulb?

And yet valid, peer reviewed and published in a reputable journal. What is weird about that? The funding?

What makes them weird?

It wasn't peer reviewed before published?

It still doesn't change his findings.

Koch Bros bribed the Journal of Physical Geography and all it's peers. Waldo says so.

Do lakes need cold like the climate scientists say snow needs cold?

It's real! Published means real and peer reviewed right drywaldo?

Who knew snow requires cold temperatures. Is that why it doesn't snow in July in the NH (except Calgary)?

Priceless!