Search results

No doubt... Much like those idiots at Green Peace that decided to protest Gazprom in 'Western fashion'... The UN is nothing more than the brain-trust for these unwitting stormtroopers that do the IPCC's bidding Good on the Russians to not take any BS from these morons and jailed the bastards...

Well, in all fairness, the Chinese and East Indian CO2 is 'green-approved' by the UN... Apparently, the emissions that will increase many times over from those nations (with the assistance from the UN/IPCC tax) will have a cooling effect AND it's proven that the glaciers will triple in size all...

There was a time when a kilometer-thick sheet of ice covered much of NorAm... Is this the benchmark that you greenies believe to be normal? Yearning for the days when much of the Northern hemisphere was uninhabitable, are we?

... Ummmmm... Carbon tax?.. Kyoto Accord?... Copenhagen? What do all these have in common relative to 'who' is proposing the costing models? Ain't the energy companies that are hollering for that

.. And who brought-up the companies (oil) protecting their turf? If you don't want to be treated like a foiler, then cease in playing the role

That's where you are wrong, sir... When there is no longer any rational argument to be made, it's incumbent that the oil companies (please use the phrase 'Big Oil" as it has a more sinister tone) are wholly responsible

Have it your way. What are you going to do the next time that a volcano spews it's CO2, ash and debris into the atmosphere?... Lobby the UN to tax someone? ... Or maybe that addition of GHGs just doesn't count?

I don't disagree with the base premise, but where I find it interesting is the anthropogenic component is a pittance compared to the natural sources that are active each and every day.... And herein lies the problem with the doomsayer crowd and IPCC - they espouse that somehow, by virtue of...

Buddy's biggest problem is that he doesn't know what he doesn't know. Too many years of believing that the only possibilities are detailed in a chapter and verse or the latest abstract from another narrow-viewed individual ... Impossible! After all, it was forwarded as a peer-reviewed...

As expected. I have seen the offerings that you have posted on the matter and can even appreciate the significance of such. However, your blind devotion on the issue represents only a tiny fraction of the variables that are involved in this equation. Much like the UN/IPCC, you can't wrap your...

By conclusive, I mean no longer a THEORY. Get back to me when you have that done... In fact, let me know when the doom-sayers can actually come up with a functional model.... Better yet, when they can lose the word "likely" in the phrase "UN: Global warming 95% likely to be manmade" Is is...

That specific, documented circumstance speaks for itself

Sadly, the science does respond to the funding, and as we saw with the UN and East Anglia University, the results can be bought

I'm just sooo glad that there is at least one group that is thinking of the children

By substance, I mean proof - comprehensive proof. If that does indeed exist, then the debate is closed..... But as we presently see, there is no conclusive 'proof', just a 95% likelihood from a lobby group.

All of those words are meaningless without any substance behind them

#117Re: UN: Global warming 95% likely to be manmade 9 minutes ago UN Climate Change Report Ignores 15-Year 'Pause' in Warming

Correction: The UN has been communicating a message based on flawed science... Even they have been forced to recognize that. With this in mind, it is up to them to prove a position rather than perpetually issuing endless press releases of their opinions.

Wow... Each time that PN has handed you an alternate, you come up with another new and earth shattering variable that proves - beyond shadow of doubt - that your ideas are sound. That said, if you are suggesting that this is a population problem, why then elect to tax the Western nations in...

I knew that it wouldn't take too long for the dots to get connected on this