Search results

Nome is on the coast. It will be much warmer than inland. Fairbanks for example has an average low of -26.7c in Jan and Barrow (on the northern slopes where the oil is) has an average low of -28.6c.

OMG! It dropped to -40c in Alaska in January. That never happens, what a shock! :roll:

CNN.com - Breaking News, U.S., World, Weather, Entertainment & Video News Live: Congress locked down after chase, gunfire - CNN.com

I already did. You didn't think you were special in some way did you? :roll:

I guess this blows the whole CO2 theory to shreds....

You are way too easy.....

Fify! :lol: Should we try that watermelon experiment now? ;-)

So your guess gets better as more evidence is found to back it up. That's what I have been saying and you keep disagreeing. :roll:

Sure thing, because quantum theory has absolutely NO actual physical evidence of anything. It is a bunch of fancy math and a lot of speculation. We aren't even close to being able to see individual atoms clearly let alone neutrons, protons & electrons. If you want to base your position on...

Actually it is almost identical to what Darwin proposed. I'm sure when your theory of AGW is a few hundred years old with a few hundred years of evidence gathered in the real world application and thousands of more years of evidence in the fossil record it will be generally accepted as proven...

Evolution has a lot of historical and empirical evidence and is generally accepted as proven. Even the church now accepts and teaches some form of evolution. No, it isn't a cash grab, except maybe for the Darwin awards. The opposite side, creationism, is definitely a cash grab and has been...

No, no Eagle. It's about the science.....the science of getting money from your pocket to theirs! ;-)

You don't! I could be a 12 year old girl for all you know. I have no idea of anyone's background here. Well that isn't quite true because I do know some on here reasonably well. What I said was I see a trend that the scientists who are proponents of AGW are much more likely to directly benefit...

Actually what we have is a bunch of scientists employed by those who benefit from the AGW scare saying it's true and a bunch of others with no vested interest saying it might be true but the higher likelihood is it isn't. You don't have a clue what kind of background anyone has on here, it is...

How about a photograph showing the math of AGW...

50% would be the opposite of bias IF it were reflecting onto the surface of a plane, but it isn't. It is reflected to the surface of a sphere which means that some of the reflected energy below the equatorial line of the molecule will miss the surface of the earth. The higher in the atmosphere...

I don't think you get it. You seem to just make sh*t up as you go. Are you saying that CO2 molecules have special properties that result in their reflectivity having a directional bias towards the earth? What? Is the reflected heat drawn by gravity? I think you make a rather large (and not so...

Don't you want to be awake to see the palm trees growing at the north pole? I personally am soooo looking forward to not working outside in -40c this year! ;-)