Search results

It's not alarmist if it's real now is it?

Not really unless you like famines and pestilence. Do you like famines and pestilence?

This is the start of year 3 out of at least 33 before it picks back up.

There is no mama.

27 years isnt an example acceleration. Its a pathetic attempt at trying to claim a win in a game you have in your head that only you are playing. There are only 3 geological processes that happen "instantly". Earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and planet smashers. Sea level rise isnt one of them.

Because you might learn something on your own.

You need to compare it to thousands of years to average it out to declare acceleration. 27 years is bupkis.

Yeah yeah yeah I have that NOAA site too. Have you moved on from Science to ideology? Sea level rise and fall is a geological process. Geology demands pragmatism and long term scale. Can you strip away ideology to take a pragmatic approach or is this a game?

You have less than 100 years out of 3.8 Billion. Narrow it down a little, what is the Holocene mean. Whittle it down further to the 1000 year mean. If you want to talk geological processes use geological time. Why would you limit it to post coldest point in the Holocene?

What did they use before satellites? When does the "satellite era" begin? Are the thousands of tide gauges around the globe broken? Try using Ft Denison's tide guage Oldest in the S Hemisphere

It hasn't accelerated.

Did I say they would?

Linear and for a long long time.

It's a big if.

Nice. I hope he likes storm surges.

Mine is 2ft above ground level. Yours?

The sea levels that are rising in a linear fashion? What about it? Is something out of norm?

Obviously its hoivin mavin reacting to claivin gloivin with the flooding and the fires and fighting and kicking and catastrophy.

You mentioned my graph showing a doubling of CO2 during the flatline. Yes, Greenland ice is cyclical and all without CO2 and at present experiencing positive gains. Water vapour and changes to land use are excellent drivers of warming. More powerful than CO2. Ag has done a 360 in the past...

NOAA isnt as obtuse and admits to flatline from 98-14 Increases werent zero but damn close enough. During that period did CO2 rise exponentially? Why is Antarctic gaing as well? NEWS | November 5, 2015 Study: Mass gains of Antarctic ice sheet greater than losses By Maria-José Viñas, NASA's...