Search results

I shouldn't taunt. You're right. *hangs head*

I'm not a big fan of "tax policy" (bit of an oxymoron), but the theory is that you set taxes to encourage desired behaviors and to discourage undesired behaviors.

Here with a rebuttal is Smiley, an Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt. . .

You'd find a good few on this board who think they were high-sterical.

I disagree, but I honor your wisdom and mercy.

That's the Twucktards. Stench kinda hangs in the air even after they're gone.

Certainly sounds like. Not even remotely responsive to my question, though. Which sounds like you.

You don't know what he's talking about? Are you drunk or just stupid? Or both?

No worries. The thesis was that approximately 60% of your government budget is eaten up by the bureaucracy. Be interesting to see services bought+goods bought+salaries paid+payments to citizens/the government budget.

Actually, completely aside from the Royal Grant, she's a billionaire. Each year the UK government releases what the monarchy costs each person in the UK. Usually around 65-70 pence/head/year.

Don't have vehicles if you can't support 'em.

Her money.

Sounds like y'all need to raise taxes.

Nope. Fits the definition. U.S. Const., Art. III, sec. 3.

Somebody released the Kraken? Good thing y'all had a hockey team to defend your city!

Backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha! I kill me!

Life's tough on traitors who lose. And losers who commit treason.

Maybe I shoulda drawn a picture of what I meant by "that," but I thought it was pretty clear from context. Guess not.

It's hardly surprising that when Ukraine replaced its string of bought-off, corrupt Putin yes-men, Vlad the Poisoner felt the need to do something. Safest place to be is in his back pocket. Look at Belarus.

Be interested to see some actual numbers on that.