Search results

Trust me, that's enough. Probably more'n enough. Never pass up a chance to scream your fear and hatred of a little Swedish (or whatever) girl.

Boy howdy, wouldn't that make us a bunch of pathetic morons? So yeah, probably.

Probably Moose Knuckle or Camel Toe or someplace like that.

You mean "here in Canada?" Nice place, but I'm not sure how that's relevant to the Pfizer settlement.

I'm sure plenty of people will bellyache about this. Pfizer is doing what Pfizer considers in its best interests.

It's a cautionary tale about carbon emissions.

Think of it as evolution in action.

Today, I blame Trudeau. Tomorrow, Biden.

OK, got it. The racists USED to be responsible for racism, but now it's the anti-racists who are responsible. Whatever you need to tell yourself.

Sounds like the perfect place for a Canadian Jew who thinks he can play JFK.

So, basically a good deal then?

What principles would those be? Is there some "principle" that requires one to refrain from doing business with "Marxist-Leninist" countries?

No, we're offering Nut n' Yahoo valuable intelligence and demanding a quid pro quo in the form of restraint. That's how trade works.

This whole slap-fight is over the definition of "gender."

Of course you can do business with a Marxist-Leninist regime. You can do business with anybody as long as you don't expect them to play by Euro-American rules. We didn't do business with the USSR because they didn't have anything we wanted.

The real irony is I'll bet smoking tobacco is coming under just as heavy fire up yonder as it is down hereabouts.

It's definitely symbolic.

So. . . anti-racists are responsible for racism? Cool. Kinda like abolitionists were responsible for slavery, right?

On an absolute scale, that don't sound too bad. That'd be about a third of a million. We have 2,264 million (excepting uniformed Armed Forces), for about 7 per 1000. But the rapid rise is concerning.