Search results

That was actually from your post when I "Posted Full Reply" Your corrupt image did that.

Nothing wrong with that stuff. I always have a bottle handy.

Great article! That is how Alarmists operate when challenged. Shouting, Mocking, Lies, Profanity, and unsubstantiated Accusations.

That is what it is all about Cap'n.

Intolerable in its absoluteness!

Nation wide baby... Coast to Coast!

Possibly. I am not sure I trust the number of 100,000 today nor the number guessed in 1790. The temp was the same though... were bats a little more adaptable in 1790?

Circle of life.

Yes we have. As pointed out they had they same temps in 1790 with the same effect on bats. You'll have to try harder.

Did you read the temps in the article? 109 Degrees F in 1790... same temp as given in your OP. Were bats more robust in 1790? The temps were sure the same... don't you agree? Do you think the counting means were the same in 1790? And 100,000 sounds like a pretty round number don't you think?

They needed something after this past week of disastrous frigid temps... ...Anything Badabing... Be aware... its a PDF http://climatehistory.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Gergis_BAMOS_Oct2008.pdf 1790 A.D .... 109 Degrees F.... Bats falling from sky... PWNED

Oh yes it haaaaas. lol And the "flying foxes" rained from the sky.

Big sea snail

An acquired taste I suppose. I tried conch down in Nassau, Bahamas... just rubbery IMO.

Is this the first time this has ever happened?

Ugh.

"The planet has a fever!"

I especially don't run errands for lazy zealots.