Search results

Some people like you to believe that. Any species that is wouldn't have survived previous temperature fluctuations which were much greater than we're experiencing now.

http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/07/13/satellite-imagery-shows-artic-ice-still-unmelted/

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24036736-7583,00.html

Well if it's localized then it isn't global warming, is it? Considering that at the other end of the globe, the ice coverage is increasing to record levels and the Antarctic ice cap is growing, it doesn't really sound like global warming. As for those articles, old stuff that's already been...

Predicted in 1967? I don't recall that. 1967 was a very hot year, a very bad fire season for the province of BC. Got sunny in June and didn't end till sometime in October. I was with the BC Forest Service at the time and we were still fighting fires. They even postponed the start of the hunting...

http://http://www.houstonenergyanalyst.com/Global_Warming.html

The evidence would seem to indicate that they're doing fine and not suffering from chronic stress at all: http://http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080708171539.htm

Here's a few: http://http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=TRD&recid=A0312770AH&q=&uid=791398326&setcookie=yes http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/igsoc/agl/2004/00000039/00000001/art00020 http://http://www.springerlink.com/content/gh98230822m7g01l/...

Here's a reference to it. http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NasaNews/2001/200102284547.html

Hi there Ton, I went for a holiday just before Easter and when I came back my computer wasn't able to access this website. I tried once a week or so and then once a month. Finally it let me back on! But now I'm out of the habit of visiting here and very busy with summer stuff so I don't...

Sigh. I have already given you that evidence, but you refuse to accept it. I'll try again. You agree that there will be another ice age. You agree that there have been past ice ages with interglacials of about 12,000 years each time. Where is your evidence that informs you of this? Why...

Oh please!:roll: First they tried to pretend there was no MCO or LIA. Then they tried to pretend it was just a localized anomaly. I haven't heard any later explanation. Perhaps they;re trying to just ignore it in the hopes that it will just fade out of public consciousness. The evidence for...

One weatherman???? www.climatescienceinternational.org Al Gore was invited to speak at the conference. They even offered his standard $200,000 fee. He refused.

Why, that would be Tonington himself.:lol:

The term "geologic time scale" only means that we are referring to an immensely long time frame. Just because it isn't of a fixed duration doesn't mean it can't compare. After all, a human time scale is also not of a fixed length. But you do have a point. Such geologic time scales are so...

It's been so long I'm forgetting the thrust of this discussion. First, Mann didn't have sampling errors, he had deliberate fraud and was exposed as such. When that was removed, his data showed the climate fluctuations he was trying to get rid of, the MCO and LIA. As for the subsequent studies...

:lol:You're suggesting that the weather channel and Wiki are reliable evidence for global warming? Did the weather channel mention, by any chance that it's been snowing on Hawaii this winter? And the MidEast, Tehran, Jerusalem, Saudi Arabia? and for the first time in recorded history in...

And now I have even less time. I've been asked to do a series of columns for a small local publication and vanity made it too difficult to say no. As to the flooding, it only involved a relatively small area. I and mine have not been affected, and I thank you for your concern. It's all over...

It might be funny if the right wingers actually insisted that, but they don't. All they insist (supported by science) is that humans are not the cause. However, it is funny that , for the most part (Tonington excepted) the left wingers make silly statements like this rather than trying to...

You know, you exhibit all the characteristics of a practitioner of fundamentalist religion No matter what, everything must conform to your faith and you go along with increasingly esoteric and far fetched explanations to support theories that are thoroughly debunked. Here's another debunking...