Search results

Would the chemical change of the oceans have anything to do with the millions of tons of lava spewing into it?

CO2 causes human retardation, we must act. Everyone should make room for a few tons of carbon. If we all pitch in we can solve the problem just like we did for starvation and poverty not to mention the stunning success of recycling and earth day. And what about war, surly this gives us every...

This thread hasn't got a thread of evidence except what I put here, recently. CO2 is yesterdays gas people why can't we move inexerably forward into the, where was that, oh yeah, the future future future it's it's it's waves waves waves not not not gas gas gas...

Oil is abiotic.

That is the valid point made by those who singed Anna. The much touted scientific consensus flogged ad nauseum by the likes of Gore and Strong never existed. If you think science is the answer then you must agree that their has been fraud.

30,000 Anti-Global Warming Scientists Can’t Be Wrong Fred Dardick – Canada Free Press April 30, 2010 Nature Magazine, the academic journal that introduced the world to X-rays, DNA double helix, wave nature of particles, pulsars, and more recently the human genome, is set to publish a...

I have no time to chase you arround in circles this evening, I have received an emergency request to test a flat of beer, at a minimum. The sun has been out for the whole afternoon and the horseshoe pits may be warm enough to conduct the iron flinging beer swilling ritual. I will tip one fer yu...

All of them have very nice credentials. I wonder if you haven't exercised unscientific bias in this matter. There is no physical mechanism that would support your favoured greenhouse gas hypothesis, and as you can plainly see any such suggested mechanism is easily proved to be entirely wrong for...

Physics Contrived. Equations for calculating heat in the atmosphere do not apply for saturation. But to pretend otherwise, a fudge factor was contrived for fake calculations. The so-called settled science is nothing but a fudge factor. No Scientifically Valid Mechanism for CO2...

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:;-)

I read it and it's wrong. Heat moves in one direction only, there is absolutly no way that the atmosphere can radiate heat back to a hotter planet. How can the incomming solar radiation be shut off? How could the greenhouse gas temp be isolated from the enormous background signature of the sun...

I wonder what it's like to be an unemployable greenhouse gas who has no work history at all? My greenhouse is plastic by the way, I couldn't stable the gas to the frame.

There is no gas called "greenhouse".

Of course the cold atmosphere radiates heat but never to a hotter mass. It's like gravity, one way only and that is down the scale. If you want two way travel then the medium must be plasma but then of course it isn't heat anymore. I think you think you don't have anything to learn about power...

later

yukyukyukyukyukyukyuk

Louis Hissink's Crazy World - Windows Live Blog April 27 Falsification of atmospheric Greenhouse effect. The following posts on Alan Siddon’s Climate Realists website are interesting: Posted by cementafriend (forum) on Apr 25th 2010, 10:37 PM EDT...

Canada to Resurrect 9-11 "Anti-Terror" Measures Despite Criticism by Former Security Intelligence Director

Always follow the money but don't touch it.

duplication