Search results

Yeah, not surprised at all. If the Arab nations want a real cease-fire, they should be going into Gaza themselves and taking Hamas out. Which usually happens. Honestly, I hope it doesn't this time. But to do that Israel and other nations who have people held by Hamas have to decide - do...

Yeah, sorry Ron, I'll stick with the experts on this one and they DO say it's apartheid. https://www.btselem.org/publications/fulltext/202101_this_is_apartheid https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/03/1114702 Also interesting: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7118937.stm --- ""If the day...

... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome_Statute "As of November 2019, 123 states[23] are parties to the Statute of the Court, including all the countries of South America, nearly all of Europe, most of Oceania and roughly half of Africa.[2][24] Burundi and the Philippines were member states...

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2019/01/chapter-3-israeli-settlements-and-international-law/ https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/what-war-crimes-laws-apply-israel-palestinian-conflict-2023-10-11/ ----- (of course Israel doesn't recognize the ICC, because they don't want to be...

Yes, there is, and it's quite a few things beyond just Religion. Honestly, probably no different than other nations - attack back. But I don't think Canada would purposefully commit war crimes and break the Geneva convention repeatedly, nor would Canada isolate Saskatchewan into a small ass...

Israel gets attacked, they attack back. And then there's times where Israel attacks (or does stupid shit to instigate knowing what the response will be), Hamas or other terrorist groups attack back (or citizens who don't have access to the weapons the terrorists do) and then it's a fight again...

Israel's been at war since before it began. The only side that hasn't changed is the Israeli side - sort of. They went from defending themselves to being as extreme as almost all their enemies. Sure, destroy everything - but not just Gaza. Israel too, because they are just as much at fault...

"The Israeli Military Said"... The same military that "Said" of civilians killed innocently "it's a consequence of war" with absolute callus disregard of those lives lost. "The Israeli Military said"... a lot of things, and sometimes they're not the truth but rather blunt lies. Why should...

Almost 2 hours, but damn well worth watching.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_genocide_accusation For this specific insanity: "Discourse on the 2023 Israel–Hamas war On 17 October, 10 days after the start of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, 880 scholars of international law and genocide signed a public statement saying: "As scholars...

So is it a tragedy, or just their piss poor luck to live there? Regardless, there is NO justification for this: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/gaza-says-israels-strikes-refugee-camp-kill-more-than-195-people-2023-11-02/ All those decades of "Special Nazi Hunters" going after...

No blinders here, sorry. :)

You're obsessed with trying to label me an expert; why is that? Cause I'm not, nor do I claim to be, on a lot of things. Like you I have opinions, maybe facts. I certainly would never claim you to be an expert in anything at all. Along with that property in Gaza, how about a Bridge?

Pointing out the idiocy of your statement doesn't mean I'm an 'expert', it just means that realistically, the "rats" as you call them will not be so easily pushed to fight in the open. If you didn't know that by now you haven't been paying attention. Of course if by rats you mean Palestinians...

Actually I'm learning a lot about how NY law works - Specific to this kind of case of Fraud, Section 63(12)- and it's a bit more than just over and/or under valuing his properties. https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-powerful-new-york-law-that-finally-brought-trump-to-book

If you believe that, I'm sure Israel has land for you to buy in Gaza.

So what happens when they have Gaza in half...?

So... you know nothing about the case at all. Not shocked.

Considering the legal stuff I'm watching on the NY case... yeah, absolutely; at least, good for the GOOD lawyers. Not so much the poor idiots who are representing him.