Search results

So we're gonna replace one idiot for another?

First, fucking eww. Second. Very fucking eww. Third... Only reason we know he has a dick is he has kids. And an attitude. :P

So he's not a Dictator or Authoritarian. Thanks for that simple comment.

Trudeau isn't authoritarian or a dictator. He's a jackass, an idiot and power hungry shithead. But when voted out, he won't cry foul (though if he does, he will then fall under those titles)

Never said, and never will say that. Nor will I say all Cons are in the same camp, because they aren't. Some are still old school Cons, who I can agree with a lot more than the fuckstains that PP and his think is the real "Cons". As unbiased as Boom and others here. Including you, Ron.

Answer is - neither side is "Good" in this, or better, or anything. Oh really? This originally came out days ago, and nada yet in anything major outside Israel, and even Israel seems "meh" bout it but then that could be just appearances. ... are you being... obtuse... on purpose, Ron...

Well since a lot of people here tend to use the Guardian, I threw that up there for shits and echo giggles. But if you'd watch the video, they mention that the use of the Civilians comes from Israeli Media, Haaretez. And then...

Except it's NEVER like Boom or other Cons thinks it'll go. That's the problem with their 'ideal Government'. Because usually those types tend to bend towards Authoritarian eventually, Dictatorships, etc.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/07/israel-idf-hannibal-protocol-hamas-attack-haaretz https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/14/israeli-forces-in-gaza-use-civilians-as-human-shields-against-possible-booby-traps Sooo.... Who are the "Better people"? JFC...

Well, that's not true. But if you are interested, try a place like Ground News; they pull stories from all over and all 'leanings' and sort it via biases. Pretty good way to keep things 'center' and 'unbiased', or as unbiased as one can be. So are other places - Reuters, AP - so that's not...

Exactly; without clear definitions of these things, it's "Terrorists are people we don't "like"" and that's it. So... you are okay with the Government telling you who/what is a terrorist organization, but not okay with it telling you other things in your life. Not that I disagree with you...

But it's all about Hamas and Gaza. https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/16/david-lammy-condemns-abhorrent-israel-settler-attack-on-west-bank-village This is why there won't be peace. Though Boom likely got his teenyweenie as hard as it can get over this I'm sure.

Didn't say it was okay. Actually said I agreed with the guy of the original article. But what the chief said about outside comments about the riots was a 'had to be said' thing. Because the Internet and stupid people and easily pissed off right wing snowflakes who jump before looking to see...

And... there's an issue with that? It's mostly performative; if they're outside of the UK, it's not like they can enforce the ruling if the citizen - especially in the US - decides to ignore the judgment if they have one.

The moment I read "Forget Trump, it is always the progressives who want to take away our rights" I had to stop before I hurt something from laughing. But to humour you, I tried again, bypassing the stupid title and byline. I will agree with the author - the guy from the EU did overstep...

What a load of absolute horse shit.

You've never heard of things like this happening in the West? You really are sheltered, aren't you.