Search results

I'm not going to read the article for you. Actually the very poor burn cow dung. But more recently methane has taken over. Guess where the methane comes from.

No, here is the reality for both photos. 17 gasoline fueled cars catch fire in the US every hour. 17 Cars Catch On Fire Every Hour In The US - Business Insider And: 7 million premature deaths annually linked to air pollution WHO | 7 million premature deaths annually linked to air...

Is it? It would have to use zero energy to be neutral. It doesn't.

Would you mind posting to the off-topic forum from now on? It suits most of your commie-nazi posts.

New York City Aims for All-Electric Bus Fleet by 2040 https://insideclimatenews.org/news/26042018/nyc-air-pollution-electric-bus-public-transportation-mta-clean-technology

I see one major flaw in this tech and that is that it does not correct the major reason why so many nations are switching to electric cars and that is that is does not solve the problem of global pollution. Producing more hydrocarbons does not eliminate air pollution caused by burning them even...

And that post proves how stupid you are. Any more gems? Good for you. And do you have your usual inaccurate source? I mean, after all I was only using Forbes - the business voice of the USA.

Solar Employs More People In U.S. Electricity Generation Than Oil, Coal And Gas Combined https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/01/25/u-s-solar-energy-employs-more-people-than-oil-coal-and-gas-combined-infographic/#1f0646e12800 Times are changing, folks and with change comes...

The constant refusal of some CC members to accept technological change got me to wondering about how many other society changing inventions were condemned at the time of their inception. Well, it turns out that there are quite a few. Here are seven of the more important. 7 world-changing...

Mayve you should come over here and help us find the sasquatch.

Oh no. What will this do to Loch Ness tourism?

I guessed you missed this comment. Surprising as it was right at the beginning of the article. The lag proves that rising CO2 did not cause the initial warming as past ice ages ended, but it does not in any way contradict the idea that higher CO2 levels cause warming.

The mirror reference is an old and worn out retort, but I don't expect much in the way of originality from someone who is so completely ignorant of almost every topic he tries to discuss.

If you don't you are incredibly either stupid or completely ignorant of the laws of nature. Which are you?

Wait a minute. Glaciers melting? How can that be happening when there is no climate change?

You got suckered again. It's Alex Jones' BS site. And the Washington Times is a BS site using a name similar to that of the Washington Post to boost its credibility.

The Brits gave up burning coal for home heating decades ago and switched to natural gas. This change was prompted by the deadly killer fogs that hit London in the 1950s, fogs caused by burning coal. Scientists determine cause of London's 1952 "killer fog"...

Apparently you have a problem interpreting the obvious. What do you think the words "air pollution" refer to in your quote? I realize that you specialize in the sticking-your-head-in-a-hole-in-the-ground philosophy of dealing with an issue or you would realize how laughable your attempt to...

Sorry, I am at a loss when it comes to answering stupid questions. In addition to the number of birds and other organisms fossil fuels kill, the carboniferous poisons are also pretty good at killing people. I wonder how many people die due to wind and solar power generation. Here’s How Many...

Wow, two stupid comments in one post. Alberta’s Wildlife Death Toll on the Rise https://iowatarsandsproject.wordpress.com/2014/12/19/albertas-wildlife-death-toll-on-the-rise/