Search results

That's a good idea. Now of course, the onus is on you to prove when those three entities decided to fleece the public. Let us know when you have something concrete.

It's called defeatism. I know of no way to do it, so that's it, end of story, case closed, let's not use coal. That's what I meant by 'going nowhere'. Or, you could look at the modern coal fired plants, and see what they do.

That's the attitude that goes nowhere fast.

Around here, we learn this stuff in grade 4 and 5. Perhaps you could go to your nearest elementary school and see what you could learn.

Sprinkle a bit of pseudo-science into a large pot of utter bs, and you can fool a lot of people quickly.

I'm not saying all of the claims about climate change are accurate or true, but you'd have to go some distance to believe that human activity has no effect on the global climate whatsoever.

So Danny Williams is resigning as premier. Seems that he has accomplished what he wanted, a deal to develop the Lower Churchill, and now he's going to pack it in. I certainly didn't agree with everything he did, but you can't say he was indecisivie or vague.

So, I'm looking through some news articles on cbc.ca. In the lower right corner are ads supplied by google, which depend on the article you're reading. At one point, the ads were for: Tasers, stun guns, and pepper sprays - huge holiday blowout. Buy now. and Intensive gun training. In...

I'm still wating for you to explain how that bill applies to people growing vegetables.

So, 95% of farmers are subsistence farmers, but 450 million of the 1.3 Billion agricultural workers get paid a wage. I wonder what the definition of 'farmer' and 'subsistence farmer' will turn out to be?

Yes, that's a minor correction. At least it makes sense now.

But the bill doesn't refer to homemade, uninspected, unlabeled foods.

If you say so. How does this make it illegal to grow, sell, or give away vegetables?

I'm pretty sure that you are better at reading than that. You do yourself a disservice by making completely bizarre claims, and deliberately misreading things. Must be a slow week out there.

Since China has approx 20% of the world's population, if anything less than 3/4 of China's population are subsistence farmers, your claim is impossible, even if every single other person in the world is a subsistence farmer. The one-child policy only applies to urban residents, not farmers.

Okay, so the number of Canadians involved in farming has dropped. I get it, that's a no brainer. Still don't see any information to suggest that 95% of the world's population is engaged in subsistence farming. In fact, the following If the population of the world is approx 6.7 billion...

Quite frankly, I find it hard to believe that 95% of China engages in subsistence agriculture, much less the world.

You're saying that 95% of the world's population are subsistence farmers?

From the Globe and Mail: Toronto Police have ordered residents of a Scarborough neighbourhood to stay indoors because a chemical plant is leaking a dangerous substance. A cloud of sulphuric acid-type mist is covering a 100-metre radius from the company, located at 10 Chemical Court, near...

It's part of the conspiracy to make you think there are conspiracy theories.