Search results

What an entertaining and illuminating dodge.

It was one of yours. You didn't like it? Was it trolling when you posted it? Honestly and openly? Or by your narrow comfy parameters?

That's why I find Fuzzy so bloody hilarious. He cries about trolling, and does so much of it, lol.

What does your trolling have to do with my posts?

The hypocrisy in your posts is getting thick.

Just out of curiousity... What would pumping water onto the desert do over all, with regards to the climate? Ton? LG? Pete? Fuzzy?

I guess that means you won't be stepping out of your troll shill box?

Look, I understand that you only parrot the science, and research of others. Without any understanding of the science at all. So why don't you step out of the shill troll box and learn. Hell you can even join in the conversation. If you're at all capable of being an honest participant.

Post #1595886 - Re: Epic Anti-Global Warming Monologue Bad mentalfloss Does that mean you want your sock puppet to leave Fuzzy?

Ok. Does the presence of ice crystals have an affect on the models used? Or on anything of note?

Won't water vapour freeze in the upper atmosphere Ton?

No, I'm way more careful now that I'm on the laptop more often than not, lol... ;-)

So did I, which is why I almost lost my sh!t when he demanding links and evidence from you, lol. Good thing I wasn't taking a sip of coffee as I read that. Well if it's coming from you, it's guaranteed to be small, and a long time in coming.

You really are a hoot. Please don't ever leave CC.

The irony is palpable. 1, You aren't worth anything less that my utter contempt. 2, You parroting science you yourself don't understand, isn't really educational. 3, Your insinuation that I need to be educated, is funny, since I've proven you wrong so many times, it's become boring. Funny, but...

Is there a key word I need to add to the Google search? All I Googled was "phase diagram". The term seems to be used in all manner of sciences. Remember, I don't have your level of post secondary education, lol. Is this what you're referring to?

I just looked that up. What should I be looking for?

Of course you don't. Ideologues can't see anything after they've been challenged. Wrong. But that isn't surprising. No, you parrot science you don't understand and add emotion. There you go, proof you are an ideologue. LOL, wait for it... There you go, contradicting yourself again. But I...

I'm well aware of what GWPF is. Unlike you, I like a broad spectrum of input, I read from many sources, ranging from complete nuttery to scientific journals. And unlike you, for good or bad, I supply some form of evidence to support my skepticism.