Search results

13000 years of steadily rising temps is all the proof anyone needs. What more do you want? Magazine articles?

There is a reason for this years above seasonal averages and it's not a global issue. It's not the first time these patterns caused very similar conditions. We saw this 80 years ago.

A prediction isn't a quantified fact. It's still just a guess. What's to prove? I haven't been asked to prove anything.

Operational risk? That's hilarious IPCC who cares? Yeah how true. Who really does give a **** about the agency that is spewing bull**** around all willy nilly based on magazine interviews. It's not costing us a ****ing penny or effecting any of our lives. My denial of it warming...

Depends? Give an example. While you're at it post some IPCC peer reviews

Can you quantify through modelling?

Quantified conclusions or corellation implying causation? Can you quantify through modelling?

Yeah. Science that is quantified and not causation through correlation. Got anymore magazine articles?

There is a reason I ignore it. There is a little saying you might be unaware of "corellation doesn't imply causation". When it's quantified I'll agree to it. That is how peer reviewed science works.

Show the peer reviews.

Is it still warming after 13000 years or is that opinion?

So where are your peer reviews? Either you can produce them or you can't. Give it your best shot.

Ice caps and mountain glaciers been in retreat for 13000 years. Why would they stop now Les?

IPCC officials admit mistake over melting Himalayan glaciers Senior members of the UN's climate science body admit a claim that Himalayan glaciers could melt away by 2035 was unfounded The UN's climate science body has admitted that a claim made in its 2007 report - that Himalayan glaciers...

I clicked your link and never found a single peer review. 2050? You realize that 2035 came from an interview from a magazine and wasn't based on anything beyond opinion but was included in a 2007 IPCC report? Great science you've got backing you. More regurgitated bull****.

Hey I'm not the IPCC who is citing WWF and Greenpeace am I? You don't think WWF and Greenpaece are creditable either? Go ****ing figure. So where are your peer reviews? Will Himilayan glaciers be gone by 2035 or 2350? IPCC says Himilayan glaciers will be gone by 2035. Where did they come up...

Where are the peer reviews? You listed citation but without peer reviews you're dead in the water.

WWF is cited and aren't even accredited. Big whoop. How many on the AR 4 list are WWF hired flunkies?

They review "literature". Read their own words. Post your list! Who accredited the WWF and why is non-peer reviewed, biased material cited?

Post your list.