Search results

Do you think they'll make the personal sacrifices necessary to meet their own outrageous demands?

Acronyms are popular these days.

Lunatic works best.

Alarmist!

That's right. Waiting for nothing because we all know Feds got out of the global climate change warming extreme weather business. That'll save a pile.

And salts. Gotta have salts. how is your carbon capture program coming along?

Why would crops decrease? Does climate change drag crop sciences down? Will it prevent Africa, which could feed the planet all by it's self from developing and modernizing it's agriculture? Is there no way to turn dirt into soil and grow crops in new regions? Climate change won't turn the tundra...

Where do you get CO2 from breeding? Are your glasses fogged up from mouth breathing in anger?

Crops will decrease? Why? The genetics are amazing these days. Drought and disease resistant traits galore. There is a cultivar for every condition and every crop.

I've gone through IPCC literature and came across a damming statement of CO2/GHGs and temperature losing correlation after a point as found in ice and sediment horizons during the past 13 interglacial periods. Interesting stuff. As far as the mean for the Holocene Optimum, we've finally...

weirdo

With the flap buttoned up. Do they make short johns?

No no no it's a brand new never before used term describing a once in a thousand year extreme event.

He's a bottom.

An Earth Scientist. It's not often I run into educated mid lifers who believe in the boogieman. Strange world huh? Have you tried the New Tide?

Yes. Because there always is. This guy I know that boinks my wife calls them an ARCTIC LOW!!! WTF is he on? TORONTO – November is here. That means winter is coming. That means the cold. And the snow. And the polar vortex. After last winter’s bitter cold and a season that seemed like it...

Same functionality. Just like how a one cyclinder combustion engine uses the same process as a V16 combustion engine to convert gasoline into mechanical energy. PS cooking 150 metric tonnes of steel today will require the same energy in 100 years.

The computer I'm typing on does exactly the same thing as the original. On or off switches. Only difference is the rate and number of ons and offs per second. Efficiency is the future not alternate Star Trek dilithium crystals.

There is plenty of research into making NG more efficient. NG has received the lion's share of eco-subsidies. GE and SIEMENS are raking it in. How many solar panels does it take to make a 150mt batch of steel in a metal arc furnace?

So we need to wait when NG is already there and being invested into at staggering rates?