Search results

It's...okay Talladega... Twinkie...

18 years of "hiatus". 60% of a "climate dataset of 30 years". Waiting another 10 for warming to kick back in as stated by NASA means 93% of the 30 year data set will be hiatus. What happened to exponential inputs of carbon equating to a " run away greenhouse effect"?

Busy busy busy... REGINA — Regina and Saskatoon continue to be in the group of cities leading growth. According to Statistics Canada data from July, for a third consecutive year, the four fastest growing census metroplitation areas (CMAs) were in Alberta and Saskatchewan. Saskatchewan’s two...

What year were you born in?

I was referring to the jib.

Slept it off I see. Good for you.

It takes a lot of heat to boil a pot.

We have to wait for the next Solar Cycle 10 years from now to see if it kicks global warming back into gear, by then well have a full, 30 YEAR CLIMATE data without warming. That is IF solar cycles return to historic intensities. Pause Over Within 10 Years Says NASA's Schmidt

Gambling. Watt goes up, mist come down.

Go to the nth dgree.

F-cking jib rats. Jesus!

Hottest

That's just another Koch bros conspiracy.

It had nothing to do with "climate scientists" and a victory.. It was just another defamation case like any other.

There is nothing unique other than the ruling on control over comments on a media site.

And it has been a boon for scientists in what way?

Silviculture huggers. That is a commercial stand.

There is nothing wrong with sugar. Lifestyle on the other hand is a problem.

Precedent? There were never any prior defamation cases against a newspaper until this? There is nothing that sets this apart to set precedent. Yeesh.

Re: Climate scientist wins defamation case against right leaning National Post Old news already posted by boomer.